Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026
06:48
Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
Assessment of a surgery clerkship's performance evaluation system
D A DaRosa1, A H Niehaus, S J Markwell
1Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2950, USA.
American Journal of Surgery
|April 25, 2000
Summary
This study validates the surgery clerkship evaluation system, finding it predicts student performance. Results guide improvements for evaluating surgical clerks and identifying students needing extra support.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Training
- Performance Assessment
Background:
- Assessing the validity of surgery clerkship evaluation systems is crucial for medical education.
- Faculty confidence in evaluation and promotion decisions requires examination.
- Understanding perceptions of student evaluation systems is key to improving training.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the validity of a surgery clerkship's performance evaluation system.
- To assess faculty confidence in the evaluation of surgical clerks and promotion decisions.
- To provide guidance for enhancing clerk evaluations and identifying students needing support.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of student files from five classes (n=339).
- Distribution of a 25-item survey on faculty perceptions of the student evaluation system.
- Application of chi-square tests of independence and descriptive statistics.
Main Results:
- Faculty survey revealed perceived strengths and weaknesses in the evaluation system.
- Significant relationships between prior performance indicators and clerkship performance were identified.
- Evidence of concurrent and predictive validity was established for the evaluation system.
Conclusions:
- Findings offer guidance for improving surgical clerk evaluations.
- Identified student profiles can inform targeted support or challenges during clerkships.
- The study presents a model for other clerkships to assess their own evaluation systems.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Assessment of apical radial pulse
Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
01:14SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...
01:21Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations: