Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Memory effects in an interacting magnetic nanoparticle system.

Young Sun1, M B Salamon, K Garnier

  • 1Department of Physics and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|November 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Giant Specific Power Generation Capacity of Micro-Thermoelectric Generators Enabled by High-Entropy Cocktail Strategy.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Tuning Magnetism of Metal-Organic Framework by Different Types of Pressure.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Electromagnon Signatures of a Metastable Multiferroic State.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Anomalous Magnetodielectric Effect in the Metal-Organic Framework [CH<sub>3</sub>NH<sub>3</sub>][Co(HCOO)<sub>3</sub>].

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Resonant Quantum Magnetodielectric Effect in Multiferroic Metal-Organic Framework [CH<sub>3</sub>NH<sub>3</sub>]Co(HCOO)<sub>3</sub>.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2024
Same author

Magnetodielectric Effect in a Triangular Dysprosium Single-Molecule Toroics.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2024
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Interacting magnetic nanoparticles exhibit memory effects and a spin-glass-like phase. Their asymmetric temperature response suggests a hierarchical model over the droplet model.

Area of Science:

  • Condensed matter physics
  • Materials science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Interacting magnetic nanoparticles are crucial for data storage and biomedical applications.
  • Understanding their low-temperature dynamics is key to optimizing their performance.
  • Previous models, like the droplet model, have been used to explain nanoparticle behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the low-temperature dynamics of interacting magnetic nanoparticles.
  • To identify the presence and nature of any magnetic phases.
  • To elucidate the mechanism governing their magnetic relaxation and response to temperature changes.

Main Methods:

  • Performed a series of measurements on an interacting magnetic nanoparticle system.
  • Studied dc magnetization and magnetic relaxation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed the system's response to temperature variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Observed significant memory effects in dc magnetization and magnetic relaxation.
    • Evidence supports the existence of a spin-glass-like phase.
    • Detected an asymmetric temperature response, differing from predictions of the droplet model.

    Conclusions:

    • The interacting magnetic nanoparticle system displays characteristics of a spin-glass-like phase.
    • A hierarchical model provides a better explanation for the observed phenomena than the droplet model.
    • These findings offer new insights into the complex magnetic behavior of nanoparticle systems.