Related Experiment Videos
Job enlargement and mechanical exposure variability in cyclic assembly work
Therése Möller1, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Helena Franzon
1Department of Work and Health, National Institute for Working Life, SE-113 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ergonomics
|December 9, 2003
Summary
Job rotation in cyclic assembly work can increase exposure variability, potentially reducing musculoskeletal disorder risk. This study found job enlargement significantly increased muscle activity and posture variation, though effects varied by muscle group.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Ergonomics
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Cyclic assembly work is associated with a high risk of musculoskeletal disorders.
- Job rotation (task variation) is hypothesized to mitigate this risk by increasing mechanical and psychological exposure variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of job enlargement on mechanical exposure variability in electronics assembly tasks.
- To assess the cycle-to-cycle variance in muscle activity and posture across different workstations and a combined job enlargement scenario.
Main Methods:
- Electromyography (EMG) measured upper trapezius and forearm extensor muscle activity.
- Inclinometry assessed head and upper arm postures.
- Analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculated cycle-to-cycle variance for EMG and posture parameters across three workstations and a job enlargement scenario.
Main Results:
- Job enlargement increased between-cycle variance in muscle activity and posture, up to sixfold compared to single-station work.
- Trapezius muscle activity showed higher variability than forearm extensors, with job enlargement effects being more pronounced.
- Variability changes varied by muscle group and posture; some stations showed reduced forearm extensor variability with job enlargement.
Conclusions:
- Job enlargement significantly increases exposure variability in cyclic assembly work, particularly for the upper trapezius muscle.
- The effectiveness of job enlargement in reducing musculoskeletal disorder risk requires further investigation into the sufficiency of observed variability changes.