No interference of task complexity with circadian rhythmicity in a constant routine protocol
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
Published on: April 7, 2020
Alexander P J van Eekelen1, Gerard Kerkhof
1Faculty of Psychology, Department of Psychonomics, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018, The Netherlands. eekelen@lumc.nl
Abstract:
Time course in task performance has been studied extensively. In particular, the investigation of circadian rhythmicity in task performance that varied in complexity. However, these studies disclosed heterogeneous outcomes. This could be the result of confounding exogenous factors, the use of diverse tasks, as well as accumulating sleepiness interfering with the underlying circadian drive. The present study varied task demands systematically within a single task and a dual task, using a constant routine protocol to examine the unmasked influence of the endogenous circadian oscillator on the periodicity of performance. Moreover, the subjects were divided into an early-start and a late-start group to estimate the potential interaction of circadian rhythmicity with the duration of prior wakefulness. The results revealed a distinct congruence in the circadian rhythms of all performance measures, with which prior wakefulness (< 40 h) did not interact. Also, single-task as well as dual-task complexity did not interfere with circadian rhythmicity. In conclusion, when sufficiently controlled for masking exogenous factors, task complexity is removed from the underlying circadian rhythms.
Related Concept Videos
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
Management of Insomnia
