Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Model for heat conduction in nanofluids.

D Hemanth Kumar1, Hrishikesh E Patel, V R Rajeev Kumar

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India.

Physical Review Letters
|November 5, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Passive Blood-Plasma Separation via Constriction-Expansion Geometry in Untreated Paper Microfluidic Devices.

Journal of separation science·2026
Same author

Development of a ventilated structure spacer for salinity mitigation in brackish water using flow electrode capacitive deionization.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2026
Same author

Acute pulmonary edema after subarachnoid hemorrhage: risk factors and comorbidities-an analysis of a nationwide database from the United States.

Journal of intensive care·2025
Same author

Exploring the potential of flow-electrode capacitive deionization for domestic and industrial wastewater treatment: a review.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2025
Same author

Protocol for establishing a model for integrated influenza surveillance in Tamil Nadu, India.

Frontiers in public health·2023
Same author

Fluid shear stress in a logarithmic microfluidic device enhances cancer cell stemness marker expression.

Lab on a chip·2022
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

A new model explains the enhanced thermal conductivity in nanofluids, addressing particle size, concentration, and temperature effects. This model reconciles geometrical and particle motion factors, aligning with experimental data.

Area of Science:

  • Nanofluids
  • Thermal Conductivity
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Classical Maxwellian theory fails to explain the significant thermal conductivity enhancement in nanofluids.
  • The temperature dependence of nanofluid thermal conductivity remains a challenge for existing models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive model for nanofluid thermal conductivity.
  • To simultaneously account for particle size, concentration, and temperature effects.
  • To explain the discrepancy between classical theory and experimental observations.

Main Methods:

  • A combined stationary and moving particle model was developed.
  • The stationary particle model addresses geometrical effects and surface area.
  • The moving particle model, based on the Stokes-Einstein formula, explains temperature dependence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed model successfully accounts for the large enhancement of thermal conductivity in nanofluids.
  • The model simultaneously considers particle size, concentration, and temperature.
  • Predictions align with experimentally observed conductivity enhancement values.

Conclusions:

  • The developed model provides a unified explanation for nanofluid thermal conductivity.
  • It integrates geometrical and dynamic particle effects for accurate predictions.
  • This offers a more robust understanding of heat transfer in nanofluids.