Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching.

Hansjörg Graf1, Günter Steidle, Petros Martirosian

  • 1Section on Experimental Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany. hansjoerg.graf@med.uni-tuebingen.de

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|June 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different Metabolic Responses to Long-term Weight Loss After Lifestyle Intervention Among Type 2 Diabetes Risk Clusters: Results From the TULIP Study.

Diabetes·2026
Same author

Adaptation of an arterial spin labeling sequence for the assessment of brain perfusion on a 0.35 T MR-Linac.

Magma (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

MRI sets its sights on collagen.

eLife·2026
Same author

Age- and BMI-Dependent Psoas and Gluteus Muscle Mass in 27,805 Participants of the Population-Based German National Cohort (NAKO Gesundheitsstudie): A Deep-Learning 3T MRI Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Properties of 3-Dimensional Cell Cultivation Matrices and Scaffolds in Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2025
Same author

Digital Transformation and Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Practice, Research, and the Next Generation.

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·2025
Same journal

Feasibility and SNR Performance of Hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe Gas Exchange Imaging Using a Balanced SSFP Sequence.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Multi-Contrast Human Brain CEST MRI at 11.7 T: First In Vivo Demonstration.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Suppression of Oscillation and Ghosting in RF-Spoiled Gradient-Echo-Based Dynamic Imaging.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Simple, Dynamic Geometric Phantom for MRI and CT Reconstruction Pipelines: Beyond Shepp-Logan.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

7T 3D-EPI PCASL With High SNR Efficiency and Robustness to Through-Plane B<sub>0</sub> Field Gradients.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Eddy currents in metal implants and instruments during MRI can cause artifacts. Minimizing metal susceptibility and conductivity is crucial for MR compatibility.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Materials Science
  • Physics

Background:

  • Metal implants and instruments can induce eddy currents in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners when positioned off-center.
  • These eddy currents lead to artifacts that can compromise image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze artifacts caused by eddy currents induced in metal parts during MRI.
  • To investigate the relationship between artifact strength and parameters like metal size, conductivity, position, and gradient strength.

Main Methods:

  • A copper ring was analyzed at the isocenter and off-center (15 cm) within an MRI scanner.
  • Comparisons of different slice orientations (xy, xz, yz) and encoding directions were performed.
  • Artifacts were evaluated based on excitation and read-out bandwidth, and compared with a titanium ring.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Eddy current strength increased with metal part size, electrical conductivity, distance from isocenter, and gradient strength.
  • Off-center metal parts caused temporary magnetic field inhomogeneities and signal loss, even with spin-echo techniques.
  • Titanium rings showed susceptibility effects but not conductivity-related effects.

Conclusions:

  • MR compatibility of metallic implants and instruments necessitates both low magnetic susceptibility and low electrical conductivity.
  • Understanding and mitigating eddy current artifacts are essential for safe and effective MRI of patients with metallic devices.