Related Experiment Videos
Infections in neurologic surgery. The intraventricular use of antibiotics
D Y Wen1, A G Bottini, W A Hall
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis.
Abstract:
Intraventricular antibiotic therapy appears to be a useful treatment modality in those CSF infections in which systemic therapy may fail. Consideration should be given to using this form of treatment when infecting organisms are only sensitive to antibiotics with poor penetration of the CSF (e.g., aminoglycosides and vancomycin) and for cases in which intravenous therapy has failed to sterilize the CSF, toxicity from systemic therapy precludes further increases in dosages, and shunts or other CSF hardware might be expected to reduce the efficacy of systemic therapy by providing a foreign body to harbor organisms. Shunts or reservoirs that are infected may be successfully sterilized with IVT therapy alone or in conjunction with systemic therapy, but this has a lower success rate than cases in which the shunt is removed. There is a wealth of clinical experience with IVT vancomycin and gentamicin that suggests that they are relatively safe. Until more data are available on other aminoglycosides and newer antibiotics, these two agents should be considered the antibiotics of choice for IVT therapy. In situations in which the organism is sensitive to both vancomycin and gentamicin, vancomycin should be used in view of the documented neurotoxicity seen with gentamicin. When gentamicin resistance occurs, amikacin and tobramycin are appropriate alternatives. The high risk of epilepsy with the penicillins and cephalosporins makes them less suited for IVT therapy, although the newer cephalosporins have some promise for IVT therapy. CNS fungal infections can be treated effectively with IVT amphotericin B but with a high risk of significant toxicity. Miconazole appears to be safer than amphotericin B but there is less clinical experience with this drug. Table 1 summarizes the dosages, indications, and toxicity of those antibiotics commonly used for intraventricular administration, which have been reported previously.
Insights
Intraventricular antibiotic therapy (IVT) is effective for central nervous system (CNS) infections when systemic treatments fail. Vancomycin and gentamicin are preferred for IVT, with vancomycin recommended over gentamicin due to neurotoxicity risks.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Systemic antibiotic therapy may fail in certain central nervous system (CNS) infections.
- Poor cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of antibiotics and presence of CSF hardware can limit systemic treatment efficacy.
- Intraventricular antibiotic therapy (IVT) offers an alternative when conventional methods are insufficient.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of intraventricular antibiotic therapy (IVT) for treating CNS infections.
- To identify appropriate antibiotic agents and indications for IVT.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of IVT compared to systemic therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical experience and existing literature on IVT for CNS infections.
- Analysis of antibiotic penetration, efficacy, and toxicity profiles for intraventricular administration.
- Comparison of IVT outcomes with and without removal of infected CSF hardware.
Main Results:
- IVT is beneficial when systemic therapy fails, particularly with organisms sensitive only to poorly penetrating antibiotics (e.g., aminoglycosides, vancomycin).
- Vancomycin and gentamicin are the primary choices for IVT due to extensive safety data.
- Vancomycin is preferred over gentamicin due to gentamicin's neurotoxicity; amikacin and tobramycin are alternatives for resistant gentamicin strains. Newer cephalosporins and miconazole show promise for specific infections.
Conclusions:
- Intraventricular antibiotic therapy is a valuable treatment for refractory CNS infections.
- Vancomycin and gentamicin are established agents for IVT, with careful consideration of toxicity.
- Further research is needed for newer agents, but current evidence supports IVT in specific clinical scenarios.