Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual field and task influence illusory figure responses.

Afiza Abu Bakar1, Lichan Liu, Markus Conci

  • 1Department of Brain Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kyushu, Japan. afiza@brain.riken.jp

Human Brain Mapping
|October 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emotional modulation of statistical learning in visual search.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

The effect of task-irrelevant objects in spatial contextual cueing.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

An open, fully-processed data resource for studying mood and sleep variability in the developing brain.

Aperture neuro·2026
Same author

The PMADS Project: A Longitudinal Multimodal Cohort Study to Understand Risk for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Impaired intrinsic motivation in psychosis risk relates to ventral striatum activation to self-generated reinforcement signals.

Schizophrenia research·2026
Same author

Identifying Priority Research Questions for Decentralized Wastewater.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same journal

Neural Markers of Interocular Grouping During Binocular Rivalry With MEG.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Neural Correlates of Explicit Outcome Expectation Effects: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking fMRI Denoising Pipelines.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Modeled Long-Term Effects of Psilocybin on Dynamic Activity and Effective Connectivity of Fronto-Striatal-Thalamic Circuits.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Intrinsic Functional Architecture Reflects Individual Differences in Passive Working Memory: An Exploratory Resting-State fMRI Study.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Symptom Overlap and Neurobiological Similarities Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Tinnitus.

Human brain mapping·2026
See all related articles

The brain processes illusory figures (IFs) differently in the central and peripheral visual fields. Central IFs are processed automatically, while peripheral IFs require more attention and higher-order visual processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Human vision compensates for occlusion by interpreting global scenes using surrounding elements.
  • Illusory figures (IFs) demonstrate the visual system's ability to complete incomplete objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the brain uses different mechanisms for processing IFs in the central versus peripheral visual fields.
  • To compare magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to IFs at different visual field locations under varying task loads.

Main Methods:

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record brain activity.
  • Illusory figures (IFs) were presented at central and peripheral visual field locations.
  • Three different task loads were applied during stimulus presentation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Central IFs elicited early responses in V1/V2 (96-101 ms) and LOC (132-141 ms), independent of task.
  • Peripheral IFs showed reduced V1/V2 and LOC modulation, with later activation in the Fusiform Gyrus (>200 ms).
  • Task load influenced early processing in V1/V2 (87 ms) for peripheral stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Retinal eccentricity significantly impacts IF processing.
  • Central IF completion is largely automatic.
  • Peripheral IF processing relies more on attentional demands and higher-order object completion stages.