Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

10:53
Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques
Published on: March 12, 2019
Strategies for reducing variance in laser Doppler flowmetry measurements
Berthold Pemp1, Noemi Maar, Guenther Weigert
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Summary
This study introduces two methods to reduce data scattering in laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) measurements of choroidal blood flow. Both techniques effectively decreased variability caused by changes in the total returning light level (DC).
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Physiology
Background:
- Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in humans often suffers from data scattering.
- Variability in LDF data can be problematic for studies assessing choroidal blood flow.
- The total returning light level (DC) influences LDF parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reduce variability in LDF data by eliminating the effect of the total returning light level (DC).
- To investigate two distinct methods for correcting LDF measurements in the choroid.
Main Methods:
- Measurements of choroidal blood flow parameters were taken in 20 healthy subjects using a portable confocal LDF device at varying DC values.
- Two strategies were employed to reduce data scattering by addressing the effect of yield (DC/gain): a third-order polynomial fit and a new linear fit method for individual subjects.
Main Results:
- Data variability was higher for LDF parameters volume and flow compared to velocity during DC changes.
- Both the polynomial fit and the linear fit methods demonstrated success in reducing LDF parameter scattering with varying DC.
Conclusions:
- Both tested methods effectively reduced LDF measurement variability by correcting for changes in yield.
- The presented approaches offer a potentially effective, applicable, and valid way to reduce data scattering in LDF assessments of posterior eye blood flow.
- Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy of these techniques when systematic DC changes occur post-intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Pipe Flowrate Measurement
In pipe flow measurement, orifice, nozzle, and Venturi meters are commonly used to determine fluid flowrates by constricting the flow area, which increases fluid velocity and reduces pressure. This pressure difference, governed by Bernoulli's principle and adjusted for real-world conditions, is essential for calculating flowrate. Each meter type is suited to specific applications based on accuracy, efficiency, and compatibility with various flow conditions.
The orifice meter is a simple,...
The orifice meter is a simple,...
Pipe Flowrate Measurement: Problem Solving
A spray tank system is engineered to uniformly distribute a pest-control liquid across plants by using a pressurized mechanism. The tank, pressurized to 150 kPa, holds the pesticide at a height of 0.80 meters. Liquid flows from the tank through a 1.9 meter pipe with a diameter of 0.015 meters, angled at 0.698 radians, ultimately reaching a 0.007 meter nozzle that sprays the pesticide. Accurate calculation of the system's flow rate is crucial to ensure uniform application, and this is achieved...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

