Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
Correlations02:20

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond Work Relative Value Unit: Rationale for Strategic Partnership Between Health Systems and Departments of Surgery.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

The Path to Independence: Progression in Entrustment Reflected in Entrustable Professional Activity Ratings.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Disparities in utilization of high-volume thyroid surgeons for Graves disease: a statewide analysis.

Journal of the Endocrine Society·2026
Same author

Assessing the Evidence for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using the Robustness of Inference to Replacement.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Reoperative Parathyroidectomy: Recognizing Unique Risk Profiles.

The Journal of surgical research·2025
Same author

Factors Associated with Receiving Thyroid Cancer Care From High-Volume Surgeons: Analysis of a State-Wide Claims Registry.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2025
Same journal

Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Design in Healthcare Education: A Scoping Review.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same journal

Development and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Module for Emergency Front-of-Neck Access Training.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same journal

Integrating Entrustable Professional Activities in Simulation-Based Health Care Education: A Systematic Literature Review.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same journal

Technology-Assisted Training for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral IV Access by Nurses: A Randomized Educational Study.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same journal

Beyond Technology: Lessons From a Simple Simulation.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same journal

The Many Outcomes of an Emergency Response Simulation for Simulationists.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics (BM-PROMA)
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics (BM-PROMA)

Published on: August 28, 2021

LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.

Pamela B Andreatta1, Derek T Woodrum, Paul G Gauger

  • 1Department of Medical Education and Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5329, USA. rminter@med.umich.edu

Simulation in Healthcare : Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
|December 18, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The LapMentor virtual reality simulator

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics (BM-PROMA)
10:58

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics (BM-PROMA)

Published on: August 28, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Simulation
  • Virtual Reality in Medicine

Background:

  • Virtual-reality laparoscopic simulators are increasingly used in surgical training.
  • Accurate evaluation metrics are crucial for assessing trainee skill levels.
  • Construct validity is essential for metrics to differentiate novice from expert performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the construct validity of the LapMentor simulator's performance metrics.
  • To determine if LapMentor metrics accurately reflect varying levels of laparoscopic surgical skill.

Main Methods:

  • Medical students, residents, and faculty surgeons performed six laparoscopic skills tasks.
  • Performance was measured by the LapMentor using 4-12 parameters per task.
  • Metrics were compared between groups after the first and fifth repetitions.

Main Results:

  • Only Eye-Hand Coordination and Clipping/Grasping tasks showed expert-level discrimination after one repetition.
  • After five repetitions, Time and Score on Eye-Hand Coordination, and Time on Cutting showed discrimination.
  • Most LapMentor metrics failed to differentiate expertise levels.

Conclusions:

  • The majority of LapMentor metrics lack the sensitivity to distinguish between novice and expert laparoscopic surgeons.
  • Current metrics may not accurately represent a trainee's actual skill level.
  • Improved evaluation parameters are needed for effective surgical simulator feedback.