Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Preparation and Observation of Thick Biological Samples by Scanning Transmission Electron Tomography
Published on: March 12, 2017
Aberration-corrected ADF-STEM depth sectioning and prospects for reliable 3D imaging in S/TEM
1Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopes (STEMs) show promise for 3D nanomaterial reconstruction. However, depth sectioning faces significant challenges, including a missing-cone problem and severe image distortion, limiting its application.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Electron Microscopy
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopes (STEMs) offer high resolution for nanomaterial imaging.
- Short depth of focus in STEMs suggests potential for 3D reconstruction via through-focal series.
- Annular dark-field (ADF)-STEM depth sectioning is hindered by a contrast transfer function with a missing-cone problem, analogous to tilt-series tomography.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility and limitations of 3D reconstruction using STEM depth sectioning.
- To analyze the missing-cone problem and image distortion in ADF-STEM depth sectioning.
- To compare the performance of different STEM/TEM imaging modes for 3D reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Depth-sectioning experiments were conducted using a C(5)-corrected aberration-corrected STEM (100 keV, 33-mrad probe-forming angle).
- Analysis of the contrast transfer function and image distortion in both real and reciprocal space.
- Comparison of imaging modes including bright-field STEM, ADF-STEM, hollow-cone ADF-STEM, and coherent scanning confocal electron microscopy (SCEM).
Main Results:
- The study confirms a significant missing-cone problem in ADF-STEM depth sectioning.
- An elongation factor greater than 30 was observed for depth sectioning under optimal conditions, leading to severe 3D object distortion and artifacts.
- Bright-field STEM, ADF-STEM, hollow-cone ADF-STEM, and coherent SCEM all exhibit a missing cone of information.
Conclusions:
- The current ADF-STEM depth sectioning method is severely limited by image distortion and information loss due to the missing-cone problem.
- Only incoherent scanning confocal electron microscopy (SCEM) effectively overcomes the missing-cone limitation.
- Further development is needed to realize the potential of STEM-based 3D reconstruction of nanomaterials.
More Related Videos
11:19Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes
Published on: March 20, 2018
12:59Three and Four-Dimensional Visualization and Analysis Approaches to Study Vertebrate Axial Elongation and Segmentation
Published on: February 28, 2021