Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Aggression01:47

Aggression

Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A large sample factor analysis of the Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates in a diverse population of incarcerated offenders.

Psychological assessment·2025
Same author

The Council of State Governments Justice Center Approach to Increasing Risk-Level Consistency in the Application of Risk Assessment Instruments.

Assessment·2020
Same author

Service Needs Inventory: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity.

Psychological services·2020
Same author

Risk assessment tool floundering? Let's ask the client to self-predict.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2020
Same author

Taking the Bite out of Mosquito Bites: The Role of Perceived Risk.

International journal of environmental health research·2020
Same author

A Principled Approach to the Construction of Risk Assessment Categories: The Council of State Governments Justice Center Five-Level System.

International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology·2019
Same journal

Who is the Victim and Who is the Perpetrator? The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on Bidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Scenario.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2026
Same journal

State Level Bans on Assault Weapons and Firearms Trafficking to Mexico, 2015-2024.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2026
Same journal

Crossing the Line: Factors Associated With Escalating Pornography Use.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2026
Same journal

The Dark Side of Sport: Trauma and Mental Health Symptomology in Athletes.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2026
Same journal

"Reclaiming the Narrative" of Sexual Violence Disclosures on Social Media: Social Reactions, Gender Norms, and Recovery.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2026
Same journal

Hate-Related Victimization in Schools: Examining Risk and Protective Factors.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Predicting violent behavior through a static-stable variable lens.

Jeremy F Mills1, Daryl G Kroner, Toni Hemmati

  • 1Correctional Service of Canada, Bath Institution, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
|September 23, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals distinct criminogenic factors for violent versus nonviolent recidivism. Stable variables further enhance the prediction of both behaviors, improving criminal risk assessment accuracy.

More Related Videos

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Criminology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Understanding factors predicting criminal recidivism is crucial for effective rehabilitation and public safety.
  • Previous research has identified various criminogenic domains associated with offending, but their differential impact on violent versus nonviolent recidivism requires further investigation.
  • The dichotomy of static (unchangeable) and stable (changeable over time but consistent) variables offers a nuanced approach to examining these criminogenic domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential relationships between specific criminogenic domains and violent versus nonviolent recidivism.
  • To examine the predictive utility of static and stable criminogenic variables in understanding offender behavior.
  • To enhance the accuracy of risk assessment tools for offenders, particularly those with a history of violence.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of recidivism data from a sample predominantly composed of violent offenders.
  • Categorization of criminogenic domains into static and stable variables.
  • Statistical modeling to assess the independent and combined predictive power of these variables on violent and nonviolent reoffending.

Main Results:

  • Confirms that different criminogenic domains are associated with violent and nonviolent recidivism, aligning with prior retrospective findings.
  • Demonstrates that stable criminogenic variables significantly improve the prediction of both violent and nonviolent behavior, even after accounting for key static variables.
  • Highlights the importance of considering both static and stable factors in offender risk assessment.

Conclusions:

  • The findings underscore the necessity of a multidimensional approach to understanding and predicting criminal behavior.
  • Incorporating stable criminogenic variables into risk assessment models can lead to more accurate predictions of future offending.
  • These insights can inform the development of more targeted and effective interventions for offender rehabilitation and risk management.