Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CXCL13-CXCR5 signaling in CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell recruitment and lymphoid immune organization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2026
Same author

Diverse Bacterial Properties Influence Dispersal Along Fungal Networks.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

CXCL13-CXCR5 Signaling in CD8<sup>+</sup> T Cell Recruitment and Lymphoid Immune Organization in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A Head and Neck Cancer Patient-Specific Microphysiological System for Predicting Response to Chemoradiation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Regulate Neutrophil Phenotypes and Function in a Microphysiological Model of Infection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Multiplexed luminal tissue constructs with reconfigurable barriers for dynamic modeling of multi-tissue interactions.

Advanced materials technologies·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Versatile Automated Platform for Micro-scale Cell Stimulation Experiments
12:21

A Versatile Automated Platform for Micro-scale Cell Stimulation Experiments

Published on: August 6, 2013

From the cellular perspective: exploring differences in the cellular baseline in macroscale and microfluidic

Amy L Paguirigan1, David J Beebe

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, WI, USA.

Integrative Biology : Quantitative Biosciences From Nano to Macro
|December 22, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Microfluidic cell culture alters cellular responses compared to traditional methods. Validating these microdevices is crucial for integrating microscale data with macroscale biological findings.

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Picoliter Bioreactor for Microbial Single-cell Analysis: Fabrication, System Setup, and Operation
12:04

Microfluidic Picoliter Bioreactor for Microbial Single-cell Analysis: Fabrication, System Setup, and Operation

Published on: December 6, 2013

Single-cell Microfluidic Analysis of Bacillus subtilis
10:37

Single-cell Microfluidic Analysis of Bacillus subtilis

Published on: January 26, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

A Versatile Automated Platform for Micro-scale Cell Stimulation Experiments
12:21

A Versatile Automated Platform for Micro-scale Cell Stimulation Experiments

Published on: August 6, 2013

Microfluidic Picoliter Bioreactor for Microbial Single-cell Analysis: Fabrication, System Setup, and Operation
12:04

Microfluidic Picoliter Bioreactor for Microbial Single-cell Analysis: Fabrication, System Setup, and Operation

Published on: December 6, 2013

Single-cell Microfluidic Analysis of Bacillus subtilis
10:37

Single-cell Microfluidic Analysis of Bacillus subtilis

Published on: January 26, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Cell Biology
  • Microfluidics

Background:

  • Microfluidic devices offer novel engineered microenvironments for cell culture assays.
  • Understanding cellular responses within these microenvironments is key for integrating microscale data with traditional biological data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt and validate In Cell Westerns (ICWs) and in situ analysis for microfluidic devices.
  • To investigate cellular responses, including proliferation, metabolism, and protein expression, in microfluidic versus macroscale cultures.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized In Cell Westerns (ICWs) and in situ analysis techniques adapted for microfluidic platforms.
  • Compared cellular responses (proliferation, glucose metabolism, signaling, protein expression) between microfluidic and macroscale cultures.
  • Examined factors like glucose starvation, growth factor restriction, volume density, and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) interactions.

Main Results:

  • Observed significant differences in proliferation, glucose metabolism, signaling, and protein expression between microfluidic and macroscale cultures.
  • Identified altered glucose metabolism and reduced proliferation with increased PDMS exposure.
  • Found cells in microcultures were insensitive to volume density or media supplementation.

Conclusions:

  • Cellular baselines are substantially altered in microcultures due to scale and material differences.
  • Interactions between media/cells and PDMS may significantly impact certain cell-based assays.
  • Biological validation of microfluidic devices is essential for accurate interpretation of microscale data in the context of macroscale findings.