Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Flash NanoPrecipitation for the Encapsulation of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Compounds in Polymeric Nanoparticles
Published on: January 7, 2019
Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials
Frank Rupp1, Jurgen Geis-Gerstorfer
1Section of Medical Materials and Technology, Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Tübingen, Oslanderstrasse 2-8, Tübingen, Germany. frank.rupp@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Comparing unset and set elastomeric impression materials, this study found significant differences in initial hydrophilicity. Some polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) materials became more hydrophilic over time, matching polyether materials.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Dental Materials Science
- Surface Chemistry
Background:
- Elastomeric impression materials are crucial in dentistry for accurate prosthodontic and orthodontic restorations.
- The hydrophilicity of impression materials influences their wetting characteristics and accuracy, particularly in moist oral environments.
- Understanding the surface properties of both unset and set impression materials is essential for clinical success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the initial hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
- To investigate the wetting behavior and hydrophilicity kinetics of polyether and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression materials.
Main Methods:
- High-resolution drop shape analysis was employed to measure initial water contact angles.
- Thin films of one polyether and six PVS impression materials were tested in both unset and set states.
- Contact angle measurements were recorded at specific drop ages (1 and 3 seconds) to assess hydrophilicity kinetics.
Main Results:
- All unset polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) materials exhibited initial hydrophobicity but demonstrated varying rates of hydrophilization.
- The unset polyether material was initially more hydrophilic but showed limited hydrophilization kinetics.
- Statistically significant differences in contact angles were observed between unset and set surfaces for all materials (P < .05).
- Two PVS materials achieved or surpassed the hydrophilicity of the polyether material, depending on the drop age.
Conclusions:
- The hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials differs significantly between their unset and set states.
- The choice of drop age in contact angle measurements is critical for accurately assessing wetting behavior.
- Clinical evaluation of impression material performance should consider both the material type and its surface state (unset vs. set).
More Related Videos
09:01A Protocol for the Production of Gliadin-cyanoacrylate Nanoparticles for Hydrophilic Coating
Published on: July 8, 2016
07:44Characterization of Full Set Material Constants and Their Temperature Dependence for Piezoelectric Materials Using Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
Published on: April 27, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Managing Impressions
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances
Impression Management Techniques II: Ingratiation
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
First Impression
Members Made of Elastoplastic Material
As the bending moment...