Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why men still get more promotions than women.

Harvard business review·2010
Same author

Women and the vision thing.

Harvard business review·2009
Same author

The innovation value chain.

Harvard business review·2007
Same author

What's your story?

Harvard business review·2005
Same author

How to stay stuck in the wrong career.

Harvard business review·2003
Same journal

The Case for Capitation.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

How to Pay for Health Care.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

How to Preempt Team Conflict.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

The Secrets of Great Teamwork.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

Leading the Team You Inherit.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

Wicked Problem Solvers.

Harvard business review·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

Are you a collaborative leader?

Herminia Ibarra1, Morten T Hansen

  • 1herminia.ibarra@insead.edu

Harvard Business Review
|August 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Effective collaborative leadership connects internal and external resources, leverages diverse talent, models behavior, and guides teams to prevent unproductive debate, fostering high-performance cultures.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Business Management
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Leadership Studies

Background:

  • Modern business environments emphasize connectivity and collaboration, driven by social media and technology.
  • Traditional management styles (command and control) may hinder effective collaboration in contemporary organizations.
  • Challenges exist in balancing extensive collaboration with efficient decision-making and preventing meeting overload.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key attributes and tactics of effective collaborative leadership in high-performing organizations.
  • To examine how leaders can foster a collaborative culture while maintaining productivity.
  • To provide insights from top-performing CEOs on navigating the complexities of modern collaboration.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative research involving case studies of top-performing CEOs and their organizations.
  • Analysis of leadership strategies in connecting internal and external networks.
  • Examination of methods for leveraging diverse talent and modeling collaborative behavior.
  • Investigation of techniques for managing team dynamics and preventing excessive debate.

Main Results:

  • Collaborative leaders excel at bridging internal and external organizational networks.
  • Leveraging diverse talent is crucial for innovation and problem-solving.
  • Modeling collaborative behavior from the top sets the tone for the organization.
  • Strong leadership is necessary to guide teams and prevent them from getting stuck in unproductive discussions.
  • Specific tactics used by executives from companies like Akamai, GE, and Reckitt Benckiser were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Effective collaborative leadership requires a multifaceted approach, integrating external insights with internal capabilities.
  • Fostering a high-performance collaborative culture necessitates deliberate leadership actions in connecting, leveraging, modeling, and guiding.
  • The study provides actionable strategies for executives to adapt their leadership styles for the demands of modern, interconnected businesses.