Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement.
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions01:22

Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions

Two primary types of muscle contractions are isotonic and isometric, each serving unique functions and involving distinct mechanisms. Both isotonic and isometric contractions are integral to the body's complex system of movement and stability. Isotonic exercises contribute significantly to functional strength and movement, while isometric contractions are crucial for maintaining posture and joint stability.
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while the...
Muscles of the Forearm that Move the Hand and Fingers01:16

Muscles of the Forearm that Move the Hand and Fingers

The muscles of the forearm that move the wrist, hand, and digits are numerous and diverse. They can be classified into two groups based on their location and function — the anterior and posterior compartment muscles.
Anterior Compartment
The anterior compartment muscles originate from the humerus. They primarily function as flexors and are also known as flexor muscles. They typically insert on the carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges. The superficial layer includes the flexor carpi radialis,...
Muscles that Move the Forearm01:16

Muscles that Move the Forearm

The muscles that move the forearms can be divided into four groups: forearm flexors, forearm extensors, forearm pronators, and forearm supinators. The flexors and extensors act on the elbow joint, while the pronators and supinators act on the radioulnar joints.
Forearm Flexors
The biceps brachii, brachialis, and brachioradialis are forearm flexors. The biceps brachii is made up of two heads. Its long head originates at the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula, whereas that of the short head is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring unintentional drifts in finger force production and muscle activity: a study of finger independence.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Distributed loads alter internal load predictions in the hands and forearm.

Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Unravelling neuromechanical constraints to finger independence.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

Shoulder Kinematic and Muscle Activity Compensations to Scapular Stabilizer Weakness: An Optimal Control Framework.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Subtle Kinematic Changes During One-Arm Pulling and Their Implications on Upper Extremity and Trunk Moments.

IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors·2025
Same author

Two cameras can be as good as four for markerless hand tracking during simple finger movements.

Journal of biomechanics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Force, frequency and gripping alter upper extremity muscle activity during a cyclic push task.

Peter J Keir1, Melissa M Brown

  • 1McMaster Occupational Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. pjkeir@mcmaster.ca

Ergonomics
|April 18, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Workload, combining push force and frequency, significantly impacts upper extremity muscle activity. Concurrent gripping can override these effects, highlighting complex muscle loading in workplace disorders.

More Related Videos

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Repetitive tasks, high forces, and gripping are key factors in developing upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Understanding the interplay of these factors is crucial for preventing workplace injuries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate the effects of push load and task frequency on upper extremity muscle activity.
  • To examine how concurrent gripping influences muscle responses during pushing tasks.

Main Methods:

  • A controlled study involving 20 participants (10 men, 10 women) performing a cyclic bimanual pushing task.
  • Varied push loads (1, 2, 4 kg), frequencies (4, 8, 16/min), and grip conditions (no grip, 30% max grip force) in a randomized order.
  • Electromyography was used to measure muscle activity in the upper arm and shoulder complex, and forearm.

Main Results:

  • Muscle activity in the upper arm and shoulder complex was influenced by both push load and frequency, often interacting significantly.
  • Workload (force × frequency) provided a better description of muscle response in the upper arm and shoulder.
  • Forearm muscle activity was less affected by push load but was significantly influenced by the addition of a submaximal grip, primarily reflecting frequency and grip exertion.

Conclusions:

  • Upper extremity muscle activity exhibits a complex response to workload, which can be modulated by the presence of a grip.
  • The findings provide physiological insights into muscular loading during pushing tasks, relevant for understanding and mitigating various workplace disorders.