Related Experiment Videos
Regulating knee joint position by combining electrical stimulation with a controllable friction brake
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|January 1, 1990
Summary
Controlled-brake (CB) control offers superior performance for hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) gait restoration systems, accurately tracking limb motion across various conditions without needing muscle property calibration.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Robotics
- Neuroprosthetics
Background:
- Hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems integrate muscle activation with mechanical components for improved gait restoration.
- Controlling limb motion effectively is crucial, especially when facing variations in muscle properties and fatigue.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the position tracking performance of three different controllers for a free-swinging shank in able-bodied subjects.
- To evaluate controllers under varying muscle fatigue states and different position tracking demands.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated three controllers: open-loop (OL), proportional-derivative closed-loop (PD), and bang-bang plus controlled-brake (CB).
- OL and PD controllers utilized a forward path model of the stimulated muscle-limb system.
- CB control involved maximal muscle activation against a controlled brake acting as a "moving-wall".
Main Results:
- The controlled-brake (CB) control demonstrated superior position tracking performance compared to OL and PD controllers.
- CB control maintained high performance across a wide range of tracking tasks and muscle fatigue levels.
- CB control did not require prior calibration or knowledge of individual muscle properties.
Conclusions:
- Controlled-brake (CB) control is a highly effective strategy for hybrid FES gait restoration, offering robust limb motion control.
- CB control's independence from muscle property calibration simplifies implementation.
- Potential drawbacks of CB control include significant mechanical power dissipation and skeletal impact forces.