Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Out of sight, out of mind? How discarded items shape environmental judgments.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

The decline of congregate care in the United States foster care system, 2004-2022.

Child abuse & neglect·2026
Same author

Are In-Home and Foster Care Services Associated With Risk of Maltreatment-Related Fatality and Near Fatality Following a Child Protection Case? Evidence From Pennsylvania.

Child maltreatment·2026
Same author

Is concurrent child welfare intervention associated with recurrent juvenile justice contact? Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Child abuse & neglect·2026
Same author

Siblings Split Between Home and Foster Care: Prevalence, Nature, and Outcomes.

Child maltreatment·2026
Same author

What Can National Child Abuse Reporting Data Tell Us About the Overlap Between Domestic Violence and Child Maltreatment?

Child maltreatment·2026
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Auditory distraction compromises random generation. Falling back into old habits?

John E Marsh1, Patrik Sörqvist, Niklas Halin

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. jemarsh@uclan.ac.uk

Experimental Psychology
|April 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory distraction impairs random generation tasks. Canonical sequences, like ordered digits or letters, disrupt executive control more than random sequences, suggesting habitual responses interfere with cognitive tasks.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents
09:13

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents
09:13

A Fully Automated and Highly Versatile System for Testing Multi-cognitive Functions and Recording Neuronal Activities in Rodents

Published on: May 3, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Executive functions are crucial for goal-directed behavior.
  • Random generation tasks are sensitive measures of executive control.
  • Auditory distractions can interfere with cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how auditory distractions affect random number and letter generation.
  • To determine the specific characteristics of auditory stimuli that cause distraction.
  • To understand the mechanisms underlying auditory distraction in executive control tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using random number and letter generation tasks.
  • Participants were exposed to irrelevant auditory sequences of digits or letters in various orders (canonical, reversed, random).
  • Performance was measured by the randomness and other statistical properties of the generated sequences.

Main Results:

  • Irrelevant canonical digit sequences (ordered 1, 2, 3... or 3, 2, 1...) impaired random number generation.
  • Irrelevant canonical letter sequences (alphabetical or reversed) impaired random letter generation.
  • Random auditory sequences did not impair generation tasks; distraction was category-specific and order-dependent.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory distraction, particularly from canonical sequences, disrupts executive control in random generation tasks.
  • The findings suggest that predictable, habitual auditory sequences interfere with cognitive control by hijacking response mechanisms.
  • Minimizing distraction from ordered, category-relevant stimuli is important for maintaining executive function.