Biomechanics and performance when using a standard and a vertical computer mouse
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026
In Vivo Wireless Optogenetic Control of Skilled Motor Behavior
Published on: November 22, 2021
Paulo R V Quemelo1, Edgar Ramos Vieira
1a Department of Physical Therapy , University of Franca , Franca , Brazil.
Objective:
to compare the biomechanics and performance while using a vertical computer mouse (VM) and a standard mouse (SM).
Methods:
muscle activation (electromyography), forearm movements (electrogoniometers), performance (Fitts' Law test) and satisfaction (questionnaire) of 16 subjects were evaluated.
Results:
there were significant differences between the VM and the SM, respectively, on motion (28° vs. 42° pronation, p = 0.001; 5° ulnar vs. 7° radial deviation, p = 0.016) and muscle activity (13% vs. 16% of extensor carpi activity, p = 0.006; 10% vs. 13% extensor digitorum activity, p = 0.001). VM user satisfaction was good (68); however, time to target was longer (4.2 vs. 3.4 s, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
using the VM decreased wrist pronation and lowered wrist extensor muscle activity, but additional training and familiarisation time may be required to improve user performance.
Practitioner Summary:
Using a vertical mouse can decrease the exposure to biomechanical risk factors for computer mouse use-related musculoskeletal disorders. Using a vertical computer mouse resulted in less wrist pronation and lower wrist extensor muscle activity. But, training and familiarisation are required.
