Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 24, 2011
DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening
Diana W Bianchi1, R Lamar Parker, Jeffrey Wentworth
1From the Mother Infant Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston (D.W.B.); Lyndhurst Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC (R.L.P.); the Group for Women, Norfolk, VA (J.W.); Long Island Jewish Medical Center, North Shore-LIJ Health Systems, New Hyde Park, NY (R.M.); West Coast OB/GYN, San Diego (C.S.), InClin, San Mateo (A.F.D.), and Illumina, Redwood City (D.I.C., P.L.D., K.W.J., K.O., R.P.R., A.J.S.) - all in California; and Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Denver (J.A.C.).
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing significantly reduces false positives for fetal trisomies 21 and 18 compared to standard screening in the general obstetrical population. This noninvasive prenatal testing offers higher positive predictive values for accurate aneuploidy detection.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Obstetrics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) accurately detects fetal aneuploidy in high-risk pregnancies.
- The performance of cfDNA testing in low-risk populations remained unclear prior to this study.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the false positive rates of cfDNA testing versus standard aneuploidy screening methods.
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing in a general obstetrical population.
Main Methods:
- Massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma cfDNA was performed in a blinded manner.
- Standard aneuploidy screening involved serum biochemical assays and/or nuchal translucency measurements.
- Birth outcomes and karyotypes served as the reference standard for comparison.
Main Results:
- cfDNA testing demonstrated significantly lower false positive rates for trisomies 21 and 18 (0.3% vs. 3.6% and 0.2% vs. 0.6%, respectively).
- The negative predictive value for cfDNA testing was 100%, detecting all aneuploidy cases (trisomies 21, 18, and 13).
- Positive predictive values for cfDNA testing were substantially higher than standard screening for trisomy 21 (45.5% vs. 4.2%) and trisomy 18 (40.0% vs. 8.3%).
Conclusions:
- In the general obstetrical population, cfDNA testing offers superior performance over standard screening for trisomies 21 and 18.
- The study highlights the clinical utility of cfDNA testing due to its lower false positive rates and higher positive predictive values.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Sanger Sequencing
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
Nondisjunction

