Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlations02:20

Correlations

34.7K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
34.7K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.3K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.3K
Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

3.8K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
3.8K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

6.4K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
6.4K
Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation01:18

Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation

2.8K
Microsoft Excel is a powerful tool for statistical analysis, including calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two continuous variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient, often denoted as "r," ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, meaning as one variable increases, the other does too. A value close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation, implying...
2.8K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

7.6K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Scammers' Psychological Warfare: A Call to Arms.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2026
Same author

On Estimating the Precision of Individual Test Scores: A Note on Pfadt, Molenaar, Hurks, and Sijtsma.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

An omnibus test for several dependent correlations.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Depressive symptoms and excess spending in older adults: evidence from WALLET study.

Aging & mental health·2026
Same author

Subjective Cognitive Decline and Financial Exploitation Vulnerability.

Clinical gerontologist·2026
Same author

Qualitative insights into participant and care partner perspectives on research-based Alzheimer's disease biomarker testing and disclosure.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports·2026
Same journal

Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Estimation in Cross-Domain Latent Growth Curve Modeling: The Impact of Reliability, Sample Size, and Missing Data.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2026
Same journal

Dynamic Modeling with Intensive Longitudinal Data: One-Step and Two-Step DSEM Approaches.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2026
Same journal

Accommodating Continuous Time Metrics within the Discrete-time Latent Change Score Model Using Definition Variables.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2025
Same journal

Does Cluster-Robust Estimation Provide Within-Study Effects? A Comparison of Individual Participant Data Methods in MASEM.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2025
Same journal

Two-Step Multilevel Latent Class Analysis in the Presence of Measurement Non-Equivalence.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2025
Same journal

Measurement Model Misspecification in Dynamic Structural Equation Models: Power, Reliability, and Other Considerations.

Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.1K

Examining Measure Correlations with Incomplete Data Sets.

Tenko Raykov1, Brooke C Schneider2, George A Marcoulides3

  • 1Michigan State University.

Structural Equation Modeling : a Multidisciplinary Journal
|September 2, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a two-stage method for analyzing correlations with missing data, using maximum likelihood estimation and false discovery rate testing. It

Keywords:
auxiliary variablecorrelationfalse discovery rateincomplete datamissing at random

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Data Analysis
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Missing data is a common challenge in empirical research, potentially biasing correlation estimates.
  • Traditional methods for correlation analysis may be inadequate when data is incomplete.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a robust two-stage procedure for estimating and testing correlations in the presence of missing data.
  • To provide a method suitable for exploratory studies requiring accurate interrelationship indexes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes maximum likelihood estimation for parameter estimation.
  • Employs the false discovery rate (FDR) for hypothesis testing of correlations.
  • Incorporates auxiliary variables to address potential violations of the missing at random (MAR) assumption.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively estimates manifest variable interrelationship indexes.
  • Hypothesis testing regarding population correlation values is reliably performed even with missing data.
  • The procedure demonstrates applicability beyond the standard MAR assumption.

Conclusions:

  • The two-stage procedure offers a reliable approach for correlation analysis in studies with missing data.
  • This method enhances the validity of findings in exploratory research and aging studies.