Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
Published on: December 30, 2025
On the feasibility of utilizing allogeneic bone blocks for atrophic maxillary augmentation
Alberto Monje1, Michael A Pikos2, Hsun-Liang Chan1
1Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Allogeneic block grafts are a reliable option for atrophic maxilla reconstruction, showing low failure rates (2.4%) and high implant survival (96.9%). Histologic analysis indicates different early healing compared to autogenous grafts.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Regenerative Medicine
- Dental Implantology
Background:
- Maxillary atrophy presents challenges for dental implant placement.
- Bone augmentation is often necessary to restore lost bone volume.
- Allogeneic bone grafts are an alternative to autogenous grafts for maxillary reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the feasibility of allogeneic block grafts for atrophic maxilla augmentation.
- To assess graft survival rates, histologic outcomes, and failure causes.
- To evaluate the influence of various factors on graft success.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of human clinical trials.
- Inclusion of studies reporting survival rates of allogeneic bone block grafts.
- Extraction of data on graft survival, bone gain, implant survival, and histologic findings.
Main Results:
- Fifteen articles analyzed, involving 361 block grafts.
- Low graft failure rate of 2.4% (9 out of 361) within 1-2 months post-surgery.
- Significant horizontal bone gain (mean 4.79 mm) and high implant survival rate (mean 96.9%).
- Histologic analysis revealed distinct early healing patterns of allogeneic versus autogenous grafts.
Conclusions:
- Allogeneic block grafts are a reliable option for atrophic maxillary reconstruction.
- The procedure demonstrates a low block graft failure rate and minimal resorption.
- High implant survival rates support the efficacy of this augmentation method.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
13:16Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015