Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterizing the effects of droplines on target acquisition performance on a 3-D perspective display.

Human factors·2004
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.6K

Exploring the role of stimulus code-response modality compatibility on the spatial Stroop effect.

Min-Ju Liao1, Shan-Hung Wang

  • 1a Department of Psychology , National Chung Cheng University, Min-Hsiung , Chia-Yi 621 , Taiwan.

Ergonomics
|February 6, 2015
PubMed
Summary

The arrow stimulus code is recommended for interfaces, as it effectively conveys directional information without causing spatial interference across different response modalities like voice or keypress. This finding is crucial for designing user-friendly systems.

Keywords:
spatial Stroop effectstimulus code–response modality compatibility

More Related Videos

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.9K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

42.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.6K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.9K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

42.0K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Usability Engineering

Background:

  • The spatial Stroop effect, a cognitive phenomenon, influences user performance when stimulus-response compatibility is not optimized.
  • Understanding stimulus-response compatibility is key to designing effective interfaces that minimize user error and reaction time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how stimulus codes and response modalities interact to mediate the spatial Stroop effect.
  • To determine the optimal stimulus code and response modality pairings for conveying directional information.
  • To identify which stimulus codes minimize spatial interference in user interfaces.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulated three stimulus codes (word, arrow, moving dots) and three response modalities (voice, keypress, mouse movement).
  • Varied directional information and physical stimulus location to induce spatial interference.
  • Measured reaction times to assess the impact of stimulus-response compatibility on performance.

Main Results:

  • Spatial interference, indicated by delayed reaction times, occurred with incongruent stimulus location for all modalities with the word stimulus.
  • Moving dots stimulus speeded vocal and keypress responses when spatially incongruent, but not mouse movement.
  • The arrow stimulus showed no spatial interference across response modalities, regardless of location congruency.
  • Optimal pairings included word-voice, arrow-keypress, and arrow-movement.

Conclusions:

  • The arrow stimulus code is recommended for conveying directional information on interfaces due to its robustness against spatial interference.
  • Stimulus-response compatibility significantly mediates the spatial Stroop effect, impacting user performance.
  • Interface design should prioritize compatible stimulus-response pairings to enhance usability and efficiency.