Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
Published on: March 2, 2015
Violating body movement semantics: Neural signatures of self-generated and external-generated errors
Gonçalo Padrao1, Mar Gonzalez-Franco2, Maria V Sanchez-Vives3
1Cognition and Brain Plasticity Group [Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-] IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08097, Spain; Department of Basic Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08035, Spain.
We discover distinct brain mechanisms for detecting self-caused errors versus externally imposed ones. This research differentiates internal and external error-monitoring loops, crucial for our sense of agency.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroscience of Agency
Background:
- Understanding the sense of agency relies on distinguishing self-generated actions from external influences.
- Error detection mechanisms are critical for agency, but it's unclear if they differentiate self- versus externally-generated errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural basis of agency by examining how the brain monitors errors in self-generated versus externally manipulated actions.
- To identify distinct neural signatures for self-generated errors and externally imposed errors.
Main Methods:
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from participants performing a reaction time task in a virtual environment.
- Participants experienced congruent (self-action matches avatar) and incongruent (deception) trials.
- A control experiment involved observing avatar actions without direct participation.
Main Results:
- Self-generated errors elicited a frontal-central error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) around 100ms.
- Externally imposed errors (deception) produced a delayed parietal negativity (350-400ms) and an N400 component, similar to semantic violations.
- Observing errors without agency did not elicit the N400, confirming its link to agency violation.
Conclusions:
- Neural evidence reveals distinct error-monitoring loops for self-generated and externally imposed actions.
- This dissociation supports the integration of internal and sensory feedback for maintaining a coherent sense of agency.
- Findings open new research avenues into the neural basis of action monitoring and self-awareness.
More Related Videos
08:51Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Mechanisms Through Automated Evaluation of Motor Learning and Myelin Plasticity Studies Using the Erasmus Ladder
Published on: December 15, 2023
10:28Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Random Error
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...