Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

07:14
A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
Published on: January 16, 2026
322
Variability of brain anatomy for three common mouse strains.
Jan Scholz1, Christine LaLiberté1, Matthijs van Eede1
1Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neuroimage
|April 6, 2016
Summary
Brain anatomy variations were studied in mouse strains using MRI. Genetic differences, not strain type, primarily drive these variations, suggesting outbred mice don't increase brain anatomy variability.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Comparative Anatomy
- Genetics
Background:
- Understanding brain structure morphology variability is crucial.
- Investigating genetic and strain-specific influences on neuroanatomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze anatomical variability in mouse brain structures across different strains.
- To determine the genetic basis of neuroanatomical differences.
- To assess if outbred strains exhibit greater variability than inbred strains.
Main Methods:
- Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of three mouse strains (C57BL/6, 129S6, CD-1).
- Generalised Procrustes Analysis (GPA) to quantify anatomical surface variability.
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify major modes of variation and strain discrimination.
Main Results:
- Three distinct bilateral modes of anatomical variability were identified in the motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, retrosplenial cortex, and entorhinal cortex.
- Variability in motor and somatosensory cortex anatomy is primarily driven by genetic (strain) differences.
- Outbred CD-1 mice did not show significantly higher overall brain anatomy variability compared to inbred strains.
- The first two principal components accurately distinguished between the three mouse strains (91% accuracy).
- Correlations between principal components of individual brain structures suggest interdependent developmental trajectories.
Conclusions:
- Neuroanatomical strain differences are captured by a low-dimensional space, offering a powerful complement to traditional methods for detecting gene-related brain differences.
- The study challenges the assumption that outbred strains inherently exhibit greater neuroanatomical variability.
- The findings highlight the interplay between genetics, development, and potentially epigenetic factors in shaping brain morphology.

