Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

08:08
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
9.8K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese.
Xin-Yu Gao1, Meng-Feng Li1, Tai-Li Chou2
1Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University.
Journal of Visualized Experiments : Jove
|April 15, 2016
Summary
This study integrates the lexical decision task (LDT) and naming task to explore frequency effects in Chinese character and word recognition. Findings reveal distinct lexical access patterns compared to alphabetic systems, offering a more comprehensive understanding.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Cognitive Psychology
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- The frequency effect is crucial for understanding lexical access in psycholinguistic research.
- Typically, studies use only one experimental task (e.g., lexical decision or naming) to investigate lexical access.
- Integrating multiple tasks can provide a more robust understanding of cognitive processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate an approach combining the lexical decision task (LDT) and naming task.
- To investigate the frequency effect in Chinese character and word recognition using both tasks.
- To compare lexical access patterns between Chinese and alphabetic systems.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Manipulated frequency and regularity of Chinese characters.
- Experiment 2: Manipulated word frequency and leading character regularity of Chinese two-character words.
- Compared frequency effects between LDT and naming tasks across both experiments.
Main Results:
- Experiment 1 (characters): Larger frequency effect in naming task vs. LDT; equivalent effects for regular characters.
- Experiment 2 (words): Smaller frequency effect in naming task vs. LDT.
- Observed distinct frequency effect patterns in Chinese compared to alphabetic systems.
Conclusions:
- Combining LDT and naming tasks offers a more complete picture of character/word recognition.
- Phonological influences and task demands differentially affect lexical access in Chinese.
- Results highlight the importance of task selection in psycholinguistic research.

