Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

991
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
991
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.2K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.2K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Adaptive Multi-Scale Manifold Embedding Preprocessing Framework for High-Dimensional Data Visualization.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Interpretable scRNA-seq Analysis with Intelligent Gene Selection.

Applied biochemistry and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Survival prediction in stage II/III rectal cancer: Role of immune-inflammatory biomarkers post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Oncology letters·2026
Same author

Phenotypic and genomic study of digital dermatitis in UK Holstein heifers.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus suppresses DHX9-mediated antiviral transcription through its nucleocapsid protein.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Construction of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Indicator System Based on the ABC Pathway for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Ablation: A Delphi Study.

Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare·2026
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K

Self-Other Differences in Decision-Making Under Risk.

Jingyi Lu1, Xuesong Shang1, Bingjie Li1

  • 11 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, PR China.

Experimental Psychology
|September 1, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

When making decisions for others, people tend to choose safer options for potential gains to avoid blame. This risk aversion for others over gains, driven by perceived responsibility, was observed in risky decision-making studies.

Keywords:
decision under riskinterpersonal concernoutcome varianceresponsibilityself–other decision-making

More Related Videos

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.7K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.7K
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
19:15

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

88.0K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Interpersonal concerns significantly influence decision-making, especially when outcomes affect others.
  • Individuals anticipate potential blame for negative consequences when making choices for others, impacting their risk tolerance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals exhibit different risk-taking behaviors when making decisions for others compared to themselves.
  • To explore the role of perceived responsibility in mediating self-other differences in risky decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted comparing participants' choices in hypothetical scenarios involving gains and losses.
  • Participants made decisions for themselves and for others, with varying degrees of outcome certainty and responsibility.

Main Results:

  • Decision-makers exhibited greater risk aversion when choosing potential gains for others than for themselves.
  • This effect was linked to the perceived responsibility for outcomes, disappearing when both options had uncertain outcomes.
  • No significant self-other differences were found when decisions involved potential losses.

Conclusions:

  • Interpersonal concerns, particularly the anticipation of blame, lead to increased risk aversion for gains when deciding for others.
  • Perceived responsibility is a key factor influencing these self-other differences in decision-making under risk.
  • The findings underscore the impact of social context on individual decision-making processes.