Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
Published on: January 19, 2024
Eye movements explain decodability during perception and cued attention in MEG.
Silvan C Quax1, Nadine Dijkstra1, Mariel J van Staveren1
1Donders Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eye movements can create artifacts in brain imaging studies like magneto-encephalography (MEG). This study shows eye movements can mimic neural signals, potentially affecting research findings.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Eye movements are crucial for perception but introduce artifacts in magneto-encephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) studies.
- Artifacts are typically removed, but consistent eye movement patterns may induce genuine-seeming effects in MEG signals.
- The extent to which eye movements influence observed MEG effects is often unverified due to a lack of control analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the potential influence of eye movements on MEG signals during a working memory task.
- To determine if stimulus location can be decoded from eye movements, suggesting eye movements might explain observed MEG effects.
- To provide methods for checking and minimizing eye movement artifacts in MEG/EEG research.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a working memory match-to-sample task.
- Eye movements were tracked during task performance.
- MEG data was analyzed to assess the correlation between eye movement patterns and neural signals.
- Decoding analysis was used to determine if stimulus location could be predicted from eye movements.
Main Results:
- Stimulus location was successfully decoded from eye movements during two distinct stages of the working memory task.
- This decoding indicates that observed MEG effects may be partially or wholly attributable to eye movements rather than neural activity.
- The findings highlight a potential confound in MEG studies using similar tasks.
Conclusions:
- Eye movements can significantly confound MEG data, mimicking neural correlates of cognitive processes.
- Researchers should implement control analyses to differentiate between true neural effects and eye movement artifacts.
- Strategies for minimizing eye movement artifacts during data acquisition are crucial for reliable MEG/EEG research.
More Related Videos
08:45Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Subliminal Perception
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Auditory Perception
Extrasensory Perception
Precognition involves foreseeing future events, such as predicting an accident before it happens. An example of precognition could be someone dreaming about a specific event, like a car crash, which then occurs...