Pediatric Physical Therapists' Use of the Congenital Muscular Torticollis Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Qualitative

Kim Nixon-Cave1, Sandra Kaplan, Robin Dole

  • 1Department of Physical Therapy (Dr Nixon-Cave), Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Jefferson (Philadelphia University + Thomas Jefferson University), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science (Dr Kaplan), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey; School of Human Service Professions and Institute for Physical Therapy Education (Dr Dole), Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania; Chatham University (Dr Schreiber), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Insights

Pediatric physical therapists found the Congenital Muscular Torticollis Clinical Practice Guideline (CMT CPG) beneficial for practice. Enhancements could improve its structure and content accessibility for clinicians.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Physical Therapy
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Knowledge Translation

Background:

  • Congenital Muscular Torticollis (CMT) management requires evidence-based practices.
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) aim to standardize and improve patient care.
  • Understanding clinician perceptions is crucial for CPG implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine pediatric physical therapists' perceptions of the 2013 Congenital Muscular Torticollis Clinical Practice Guideline (CMT CPG).
  • To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing the CMT CPG in clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted.
  • Thirteen pediatric physical therapists from diverse settings participated.
  • Interviews explored guideline influence, implementation factors, and knowledge translation.

Main Results:

  • Positive perceptions included the guideline's flow charts, synthesized evidence, and validated approaches.
  • Negative perceptions cited the guideline's length and lack of coverage for non-evidence-based approaches.
  • Key themes: evidence for practice, clinician education, and CPG structure.

Conclusions:

  • The CMT CPG offers benefits to pediatric physical therapists.
  • Recommendations are provided for future CPG enhancement and development.
Abstract