Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
NEW GENETIC MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH SUSCEPTIBILITY TO EXFOLIATION SYNDROME AMONG GEORGIAN POPULATION
N Kobakhidze1, S Tabagari2, G Chichua3
11David Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi; 2Chichua Medical Center Mzera, LLC, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to identify susceptibility variants of CACNA1A, POMP, TMEM136, AGPAT1, RBMS3, and SEMA6A genes for Exfoliation Syndrome (XFS) and Exfoliation Glaucoma (XFG) by a case-control association study approach among Georgian population. Self-reported Georgian subjects were recruited between 2015 and 2017 at a specialized ophthalmic center. Patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examination to diagnose or exclude Exfoliation Syndrome and Exfoliation Glaucoma. Patients underwent peripheral blood sampling. Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) was performed using Illumina OmniExpress Microarray (USA). One hundred and thirty-two XFS patients (including XFG-affected individuals) and 199 healthy subjects were included into the study. Six genes CACNA1A rs4926244, POMP rs7329408, TMEM136 rs11827818, AGPAT1 rs3130283, RBMS3 rs12490863 and SEMA6A rs10072088 variants were identified. The A alleles of SEMA6A and POMP genes are likely the risk factors of disease development in Georgians with p=0.001; OR= 1.8, 95% CI 1.2676 to 2.6973 and p=0.001; OR=1.6, 95% CI 0.9931 to 2.5634, respectively. SEMA6A homozygotes have 4 times greater risk compared to normal individuals, with p<0.004; OR=4.0, 95% CI 1.1531 to 13.9903. The G allele of CACNA1A in homozygous state increases the risk up to 3-fold with p<0.05, OR=3.15, 95% CI 0.9275 to 10.6658. The A alleles of SEMA6A and POMP increased XFG susceptibility more than 3 times (p=0.04; OR= 3.4; 95% CI: 1.2676 to 2.6973 and p=0.02; OR= 2.7; 95% CI: 0.9931 to 2.5634, respectively). Three high-risk genes have been identified in connection to XFS in Georgian population. Two genes are relevant to XFG. Three other previously described genes are not associated with the disease development.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
09:37A Phenotyping Regimen for Genetically Modified Mice Used to Study Genes Implicated in Human Diseases of Aging
Published on: July 14, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Pleiotropy
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Incomplete Dominance
Cohesins
Cohesin complexes in Meiotic Division
Meiosis involves two distinct rounds of chromosomal segregation and cell divisions— Meiosis I followed by Meiosis II – producing four daughter cells. Meiosis I includes the separation of...
Pedigree Analysis