Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
2.1K
Immediate Loading of Single Implants, Guided Surgery, and Intraoral Scanning: A Nonrandomized Study
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
|September 21, 2020
Summary
Fully guided surgery with immediate implant loading showed improved soft tissue results but a lower survival rate. Freehand surgery with immediate loading demonstrated better implant survival over one year.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Prosthodontics
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Immediate loading of dental implants is a common practice.
- Fully guided surgical procedures offer enhanced precision in implant placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical and esthetic outcomes of immediately loaded single implants placed with versus without fully guided surgery.
- Evaluate implant survival, bone loss, soft tissue changes, and esthetic scores.
Main Methods:
- A 1-year prospective nonrandomized study compared digital implant planning with fully guided surgery and immediate loading (DIL) versus freehand surgery with immediate loading (IL).
- Outcome measures included implant survival, marginal bone loss, soft tissue changes, papilla index, pink and white esthetic scores (PES and WES), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Main Results:
- The DIL group had a 90.5% implant survival rate, while the IL group had no implant failures.
- The DIL group showed significantly higher papilla index scores and reduced soft tissue changes compared to the IL group.
- No significant differences were observed in marginal bone loss, PES, WES, or PROMs between the groups after 1 year.
Conclusions:
- Fully guided surgery combined with immediate implant loading may negatively impact implant survival.
- Immediate loading and fully guided surgery, utilizing a digital workflow, positively influence early soft tissue adaptation.

