Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 30, 2025

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Long-Term Visual, Refractive and Topographic Outcomes of "Epi-off" Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric
Ibrahim Amer1, Abdelhakeem Elaskary1, Ali Mostafa2
1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, AL-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt.
Insights
Standard corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) showed better outcomes than accelerated CXL for pediatric keratoconus management over three years. Standard CXL significantly reduced corneal steepness and thickness.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Pediatric Eye Care
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive corneal ectasia affecting young patients.
- Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a standard treatment to halt keratoconus progression.
- Comparing standard and accelerated CXL protocols is crucial for optimizing pediatric keratoconus management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of standard versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).
- To evaluate the efficacy of these CXL protocols in pediatric keratoconus patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, comparative observational study involving 68 eyes of 35 pediatric keratoconus patients (<18 years).
- Group I received standard Epi-Off CXL (3 mW/cm², 30 min); Group II received accelerated Epi-Off CXL (9 mW/cm², 10 min).
- Visual acuity, refractive error, simulated keratometry, and corneal pachymetry were assessed preoperatively and for 3 years postoperatively.
Main Results:
- No significant changes in uncorrected or corrected distance visual acuity were observed in either group after 3 years.
- Accelerated CXL showed a significant increase in spherical equivalent (p=0.012), while standard CXL demonstrated significant reductions in simulated keratometry (Sim K-1, K-max, K-mean) and corneal pachymetry (18.4 μm, p=0.001).
- No significant changes in postoperative cylinder or Q-value were noted for either procedure.
Conclusions:
- Both standard and accelerated CXL protocols are effective in managing pediatric keratoconus.
- The standard CXL procedure demonstrated superior outcomes in improving corneal topography and thickness compared to the accelerated protocol.
Purpose:
To compare the visual, refractive and topographic outcomes of standard and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in pediatric keratoconus patients.
Methods:
Prospective, comparative observational study on 68 eyes of 35 pediatric keratoconus patients (<18 years). Patients were classified into two groups, group (I) included 34 eyes and received standard "Epi-Off" CXL (3 mW/cm2, 30 min.) and group (II) included 34 eyes and received accelerated "Epi-Off" CXL (9 mW/cm2, 10 min.). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), simulated keratometry (Sim K-1, Sim K-2, K-max, K-mean), cylindrical (CYL), pachymetry and Q-value were evaluated preoperatively and for 3 years postoperatively.
Results:
Postoperative UDVA and CDVA did not significantly change in both groups after 3 years. Postoperative SE was increased significantly in accelerated CXL (p=0.012) with no significant change in the postoperative cylinder in both procedures. Standard CXL had greater "significant" effect in decreasing Sim K-1, K-max and K-mean. The mean reduction in postoperative corneal pachymetry (at thinnest location) was significant in standard CXL (18.4 μm) (p=0.001). No significant change was noticed in postoperative Q-value.
Conclusion:
Standard and accelerated CXL protocols are efficient in pediatric keratoconus management with better outcomes in the standard procedure.
More Related Videos
12:25Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking TXL for Myopia
Published on: January 6, 2018
05:56Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016