Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Design Consideration

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc

Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc

Assessing safety in wind-exposed installations is crucial to preventing potential failures. This example explores the calculation and design adjustments needed to mount a circular disc on a building facade, where wind forces are a primary concern. A 4-meter diameter disc was initially designed as an aesthetic feature facing winds at a velocity of 25 meters per second, with an air density of 1.25 kilograms per cubic meter. Given these conditions, the drag force on the disc was determined using...

Controller Configurations

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Positive and negative affect influence learning during exposure therapy: Secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Journal of anxiety disorders·2026

Same author

Linking compromise and responsibility attribution to risky decision-making in dyadic foraging.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Expectancy updating predicts anxiety symptom reduction from exposure therapy: Predictive analyses from a randomized clinical trial.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026

Same author

New and emerging treatments for anxiety disorders.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same author

Utilizing social foraging as a framework to study decisions in groups.

iScience·2026

Same author

Transdiagnostic mental health symptom dimensions predict use of flexible model-based inference in complex environments.

Translational psychiatry·2026

Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

A Decision Architecture for Safety Computations.

Sarah M Tashjian¹, Tomislav D Zbozinek¹, Dean Mobbs²

¹Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

|March 6, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The human brain computes safety through a dynamic interplay of threat and self-evaluations, not just the absence of danger. This process involves distinct brain regions, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), to guide survival decisions.

Keywords:

decision making safety threat ventromedial prefrontal cortex

More Related Videos

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Structural Design and Manufacturing of a Cruiser Class Solar Vehicle

Structural Design and Manufacturing of a Cruiser Class Solar Vehicle

Published on: January 30, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Structural Design and Manufacturing of a Cruiser Class Solar Vehicle

Structural Design and Manufacturing of a Cruiser Class Solar Vehicle

Published on: January 30, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Decision-Making

Background:

Accurate safety estimation is crucial for non-defensive survival behaviors.
The neural mechanisms underlying safety computation remain under-explored.
Existing research often views safety as merely the inverse of danger.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel model for how the human brain computes safety.
To investigate the distinct neural processes involved in safety estimation.
To differentiate safety computation from threat evaluation.

Main Methods:

Conceptualized a two-component model of safety estimation: threat-oriented and self-oriented evaluations.
Hypothesized distinct ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) involvement in threat and safety processing.
Synthesized existing human neuroimaging literature.

Main Results:

Safety estimation involves a dynamic interaction between threat and self-oriented evaluations.
Distinct vmPFC regions are implicated in processing threat versus safety.
Safety is computed independently, not as a simple inverse of danger.

Conclusions:

The brain employs independent computations for safety, distinct from danger.
The vmPFC plays a critical role in mediating survival decisions through safety estimation.
Understanding safety computation is key to understanding defensive and non-defensive behaviors.