Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

08:25
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
15.6K
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.
Gordon Pennycook1,2, Ziv Epstein3,4, Mohsen Mosleh4,5
1Hill/Levene Schools of Business, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. gordon.pennycook@uregina.ca.
Nature
|March 18, 2021
Summary
People often share social media misinformation because they overlook accuracy. Shifting attention to accuracy can improve the quality of shared news, challenging claims that partisanship outweighs accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Social Media Studies
- Information Science
- Psychology
Background:
- Growing concern over the spread of false and misleading news on social media platforms.
- Existing research seeks to understand the drivers of misinformation sharing and develop mitigation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate why individuals share misinformation on social media.
- To identify effective interventions to reduce the sharing of inaccurate content online.
Main Methods:
- Conducted four survey experiments and one field experiment on Twitter.
- Analyzed headline veracity, sharing intentions, and judgments of accuracy.
- Employed computational analyses to examine sharing behaviors.
Main Results:
- Headline accuracy had minimal impact on sharing intentions, despite influencing accuracy judgments.
- A dissociation exists between perceived accuracy and sharing behavior, suggesting sharing doesn't always equate to belief.
- Subtly directing users' attention toward accuracy significantly improved the quality of news they shared.
Conclusions:
- Individuals often share misinformation due to a lack of focus on accuracy, not a preference for inaccuracy.
- Findings challenge the notion that partisanship consistently overrides accuracy in online sharing.
- Attention-based interventions offer a scalable solution for social media platforms to combat misinformation.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Precision
13.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
13.3K
Confirmation Biases
7.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.5K
False Memories
217
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
217
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
419
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
419
Understanding Deception
68
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
68
Halo Effect
142
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
142

