Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

92.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
92.2K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

34.3K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
34.3K
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

25
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
25
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion01:20

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

737
Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
737

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facilitation, interference, or both? Disentangling processes in the stroop, simon, and flanker tasks using neutral conditions and distributional analyses.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

The Relationship Between Dissociated Measures of Inhibition and Hypnotic and Placebo Analgesia Effects.

Biopsychosocial science and medicine·2025
Same author

Emotional responses during communicational comfort: the effect of personality through the prism of process communication model.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Visual-to-auditory sensory substitution with passive movements in a double participant setup.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Editorial for the special issue entitled: Mechanisms of control in selective attention tasks.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Age-related changes in attentional selection: revealing processes underlying the degradation of task set quality.

Psychological research·2025
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.9K

Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?

Mariana Burca1, Virginie Beaucousin1, Pierre Chausse2

  • 1Université de Rouen Normandie, Department of Psychology CRFDP, Rouen, France.

Experimental Psychology
|December 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study provides clear evidence that semantic conflict contributes to the Stroop interference effect. However, data were inconclusive on whether single-letter coloring and cueing reduce this semantic conflict.

Keywords:
Stroop interferenceresponse conflictsemantic conflictsingle-letter coloring and cueing

More Related Videos

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

39.6K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.9K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

39.6K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • The Stroop interference effect is a well-known phenomenon in cognitive psychology.
  • Previous research has debated the specific role of semantic conflict versus response conflict in this effect.
  • The potential for mitigation strategies, like single-letter coloring and cueing, remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide unambiguous evidence for the contribution of semantic conflict to the Stroop interference effect.
  • To investigate the efficacy of a single-letter coloring and cueing procedure in reducing semantic conflict.
  • To challenge existing single-stage response competition models of the Stroop task.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a considerable sample size for robust statistical analysis.
  • Employed both frequentist and Bayesian inferential approaches to analyze Stroop task data.
  • Designed experiments to isolate semantic conflict, avoiding confounds with response conflict or facilitation.

Main Results:

  • Presented the first unambiguous evidence demonstrating a contribution of semantic conflict to the overall Stroop interference effect.
  • Found inconclusive results regarding the reduction of semantic conflict by the single-letter coloring and cueing procedure.
  • Data strongly suggest that cognitive selection occurs at the semantic level during the Stroop task.

Conclusions:

  • Semantic conflict is a genuine component of the Stroop interference effect, contradicting single-stage response competition models.
  • The findings support a composite, rather than unitary, view of the Stroop interference effect.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the effectiveness of mitigation strategies and fully resolve outstanding Stroop literature issues.