Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

10
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
10
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

11
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
11
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the Effectiveness of Herbal Intracanal Irrigants in Deciduous Molars: A Systematic Review.

International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry·2026
Same author

Platinum surface oxides govern the cathodic overpotential of the oxygen reduction reaction.

EES catalysis·2026
Same author

Identifying and Mitigating Adverse X‑ray Induced Effects in Operando Spectroscopic Studies of Copper Exchanged Zeolites.

The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces·2025
Same author

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Neonatologists on Palatal Prostheses for Airway and Feeding in Pierre Robin Syndrome: A Nationwide Survey.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of combined extraoral vibration and cooling on pain perception due to inferior alveolar nerve block administration in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine·2025
Same author

Antibacterial Properties of Lemon Juice-Mediated Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2025
Same journal

Assessment of lower incisor position and symphysis dimensions among different skeletal patterns in the Chhattisgarh population.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Low T3 syndrome and short-term outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A retrospective observational study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular risk prevention awareness and practices in type 2 diabetes: Linking HbA1c and lipid levels.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Assessment of periodontal condition using basic periodontal examination scores: A retrospective clinical study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of osseointegration among different surface modification techniques in dental implants.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Micro-osteoperforations' impact on orthodontic tooth movement rate: Split mouth research.

Bioinformation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
03:07

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses

Published on: October 11, 2024

658

Single visit versus multiple visit root canal.

Fahmida Binti Abd Rahman1, Mahesh Ramakrishnan1, M S Niveditha1

  • 1Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 77, India.

Bioinformation
|December 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Single visit endodontics is preferred for root canals, though current data favors multiple visits. This study analyzed 9017 patient records to assess treatment preferences.

Keywords:
Canalsmulti visitspulp necrosissingle visit

More Related Videos

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
07:14

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities

Published on: May 24, 2022

4.7K
Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System
07:03

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System

Published on: May 5, 2022

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
03:07

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses

Published on: October 11, 2024

658
Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
07:14

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities

Published on: May 24, 2022

4.7K
Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System
07:03

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System

Published on: May 5, 2022

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Endodontics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Single visit endodontics presents numerous advantages over traditional multi-visit treatments.
  • Assessing patient and treatment preferences for single versus multiple visit root canal therapies is crucial for optimizing dental care.
  • Dental caries frequently affects individuals aged 26 to 45 years, highlighting the need for efficient treatment modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the preference for single-visit endodontic treatment compared to multi-visit root canal procedures.
  • To analyze existing patient records to determine trends in endodontic treatment choices.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 9017 patient records was conducted from an initial dataset of 86,000.
  • Statistical analysis, including the Chi-square test (p < 0.05), was employed to evaluate the data.
  • Inclusion criteria were applied to select relevant patient records for the study.

Main Results:

  • The analysis revealed that individuals aged 26 to 45 years are most commonly affected by dental caries.
  • Available data indicates a bias towards multi-visit endodontic treatments over single-visit options.
  • This preference for multi-visit treatments was observed irrespective of the number of root canals involved.

Conclusions:

  • Despite the advantages of single visit endodontics, current data suggests a prevailing bias towards multi-visit root canal treatments.
  • Further research may be needed to understand the reasons behind this bias and to promote the adoption of single-visit procedures.
  • Optimizing endodontic treatment strategies requires addressing patient and provider preferences for single versus multiple visit approaches.