Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

15:00
The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
Published on: May 2, 2021
3.6K
Testing Precision and Accuracy of an Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Targeting Task Assessment
Julia A Dunn1,2, Carolyn E Taylor1,2, Bob Wong3
1Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
|September 20, 2022
Summary
This study developed an assessment for extended physiological proprioception (EPP), a skill crucial for prosthetic control. The assessment demonstrated reliability and feasibility in healthy adults, showing reduced accuracy when eyes were closed.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Human Motor Control
Background:
- Proprioception, the sense of body position, is vital for motor control.
- Extended physiological proprioception (EPP) is a learned ability to extend this sense to external tools, critical for prosthetic device use.
- Developing reliable assessments for EPP is essential for clinical translation and rehabilitation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an assessment tool for measuring extended physiological proprioception (EPP).
- To evaluate the precision, accuracy, and test-retest reliability of an upper extremity (UE) proprioceptive targeting task.
- To establish normative data for EPP assessment in a nonamputee population.
Main Methods:
- Participants (N=20) performed a UE proprioceptive targeting task in two sessions, separated by one week.
- The task was assessed with eyes open and eyes closed, using dominant and nondominant hands.
- Precision (targeting consistency) and accuracy (closeness to target) were the primary outcome measures.
Main Results:
- Both precision and accuracy significantly decreased when participants closed their eyes (P<.001).
- Dominance affected accuracy in the eyes-open condition, but not in the eyes-closed condition.
- No significant differences in precision or accuracy were found between the two test sessions, indicating good test-retest reliability.
Conclusions:
- The developed assessment is feasible for measuring EPP, demonstrating reliance on proprioception, hand symmetry, and reliability.
- The findings support the use of this assessment for longitudinal measurements and establishing normative values in healthy young adults.
- Further validation in clinical populations is recommended to assess its utility in individuals with limb differences or impairments.

