Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Exercise stress cardiomyopathy-a case report.

European heart journal. Case reports·2026

Same author

A challenge and an opportunity: integrating stent removal into ERCP workflow.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2025

Same author

Frequency and predictors of delayed clearance of prophylactic pancreatic stents after ERCP.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2025

Same author

From English to "Englishes": A Process Perspective on Enhancing the Linguistic Responsiveness of Culturally Tailored Cancer Prevention Interventions.

Journal of participatory medicine·2024

Same author

An instrumentation guide to measuring thermal conductivity using frequency domain thermoreflectance (FDTR).

The Review of scientific instruments·2024

Same author

Multimodality cardiac imaging in iatrogenic coronary artery fistula - author's response to: "Insights and observations on post-septal myectomy coronary cameral fistula".

European heart journal. Case reports·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model

Published on: May 6, 2020

Orthobiologic Standardization and Clinical Outcome Measurement.

Joshua Martin¹, Gerard Malanga²

¹Washington, DC, USA.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

|November 21, 2022

Summary

Standardizing orthobiologics is crucial, as variations in cellular components and concentrations impact patient outcomes. Consistent measurement and processing are needed for platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate, and adipose tissue injections.

Keywords:

MFAT PRP Standardization

More Related Videos

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Published on: March 18, 2022

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 20, 2025

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model

Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model

Published on: May 6, 2020

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

Published on: March 18, 2022

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

Orthopedic medicine
Regenerative medicine
Biologics development

Background:

Orthobiologics use cellular therapies to enhance tissue healing.
Current orthobiologic preparations lack standardized cellular components and concentrations.
Variability in preparation methods may affect clinical efficacy and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the urgent need for standardization in orthobiologics.
To emphasize the importance of measuring cellular constituents and standardizing processing.
To address the variability in current orthobiologic treatments.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on orthobiologics variability.
Analysis of factors influencing orthobiologic efficacy (cellular components, concentrations, processing).
Comparison of measurement techniques for different orthobiologic types.

Main Results:

Significant evidence suggests cellular factors critically impact patient outcomes.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) allow for cell counting.
Adipose-derived treatments require standardized processing due to difficult cellular quantification.

Conclusions:

Standardization of orthobiologics is imperative for consistent and improved patient results.
Development of standardized measurement protocols for cellular components is necessary.
Standardized processing techniques for adipose-derived orthobiologics are essential.