Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

202
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
202
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

246
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
246
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

638
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
638
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

474
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
474
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

181
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
181
Linear time-invariant Systems01:23

Linear time-invariant Systems

328
A system is linear if it displays the characteristics of homogeneity and additivity, together termed the superposition property. This principle is fundamental in all linear systems. Linear time-invariant (LTI) systems include systems with linear elements and constant parameters.
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be...
328

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Imagining and building wise machines: the centrality of AI metacognition.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to 'If not me, then who? Responsibility and replacement' [Cognition 242 (2024) 105646].

Cognition·2025
Same author

How children map causal verbs to different causes across development.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

A signaling theory of self-handicapping.

Cognition·2025
Same author

A framework for blaming willful ignorance.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K

Active causal structure learning in continuous time.

Tianwei Gong1, Tobias Gerstenberg2, Ralf Mayrhofer3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Cognitive Psychology
|December 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People actively learn causal structures in continuous time by strategically intervening. Their choices balance information gain with inferential simplicity, highlighting the role of metacognition in complex causal learning.

Keywords:
Causal cyclesCausal learningInterventionResource rationalityTime

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 15, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.1K
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Causal cognition research often focuses on discrete data, overlooking continuous-time learning.
  • Understanding latent causal structures in dynamic environments is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how individuals learn causal structure in continuous time.
  • Examine the role of active intervention timing and targeting in causal learning.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to observe participants' interventions in continuous-time settings.
  • Analyzed the relationship between data informativeness, evidential complexity, and learning accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Learning accuracy is influenced by the informativeness and complexity of generated data.
  • Intervention strategies balance maximizing information with minimizing inferential complexity.
  • Participants optimize interventions for simple, informative causal dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Continuous-time causal learning presents unique challenges to existing computational models.
  • Metacognitive awareness of inferential limits is vital for effective real-world causal learning.