PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS IN GENDER-AFFIRMING MASTECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Following increased cultural awareness, expanded access to care, and decreased stigmatization, the number of transgender individuals seeking gender affirmation surgery such as gender-affirmation mastectomy (GAM) continues to rise. While post-mastectomy breast tissue is often sent for pathologic evaluation, few studies address the utility and standardization of this practice. This literature review evaluates the pathology findings in GAM specimens reported in the medical literature. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed to evaluate all medical publications related to pathology reports following GAM. The overall type and incidence of benign and malignant breast lesions were analyzed to elucidate which patient characteristics significantly affect the pathology findings. Overall, eight of 488 identified studies met inclusion criteria (1278 patients). The incidence of pre-malignant lesions was 2.42%, including flat epithelial atypia (0.08%), atypical hyperplasia (0.23%), atypical ductal hyperplasia (1.33%), atypical lobular hyperplasia (0.39%), and lobular carcinoma in situ (0.39%).Patient age, hormonal therapy, and family / patient history of breast cancer were inconsistently reported among included studies. Lack of standardized pathologic classification did not permit further statistical analysis. Although patients who undergo GAM are unlikely to have premalignant or malignant findings on breast pathology examination, pathologic evaluation of breast tissue remains common practice. Additional studies, which include a standardized method of pathologic evaluation, are necessary before practice guidelines can be recommended.