Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

06:24
A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
Published on: May 11, 2020
8.9K
Learning Needle Placement in Soft Tissue With Robot-assisted Navigation
Philipp Lautenschlaeger1, Nils Rathmann2, Andreas Rothfuss3
1Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
In Vivo (Athens, Greece)
|March 7, 2023
Summary
Novices using a novel robotic assistance system (RAS) for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided needle placement showed improved speed and confidence. Precision remained consistent, indicating early proficiency with the RAS technology.
Area of Science:
- Medical robotics
- Medical imaging technology
- Surgical simulation
Background:
- Novice practitioners require effective training methods for complex procedures.
- Robotic assistance systems (RAS) offer potential for enhanced precision and control in interventions.
- Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides real-time imaging guidance for needle placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the learning curves of novices using a novel RAS for CBCT-guided needle placement.
- To assess the impact of RAS on precision, intervention duration, autonomy, and confidence.
- To determine the feasibility of RAS in training for image-guided procedures.
Main Methods:
- Ten novice participants performed 18 CBCT-guided needle punctures each in a phantom model.
- Training and practice were conducted over three days with RAS support.
- Key performance metrics included needle tip deviation, total intervention time, needle placement duration, autonomy, and self-reported confidence.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in needle tip deviation was observed across trial days (Day 1: 2.82 mm vs. Day 3: 3.07 mm).
- Significant reductions in total intervention duration (Day 1: 11:22 min vs. Day 3: 07:39 min) and needle placement duration (Day 1: 03:17 min vs. Day 3: 02:11 min) were recorded.
- Participant autonomy (Day 1: 94% vs. Day 3: 99%) and confidence (Day 1: 78% vs. Day 3: 91%) significantly increased.
Conclusions:
- Novices achieved precise CBCT-guided needle interventions with RAS support from the first day.
- The RAS facilitated significant improvements in procedural efficiency and participant confidence over the trial period.
- The study demonstrates the potential of RAS to accelerate the learning curve for image-guided interventions.

