Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Using serial dependence to predict confidence across observers and cognitive domains
Ning Mei1, Dobromir Rahnev2, David Soto3,4
1Basque Center on Cognition, Brain, and Language, San Sebastian, Spain. n.mei@bcbl.eu.
Temporal patterns in confidence judgments show serial dependence, generalizing across different cognitive tasks and observers. Recent confidence history, not accuracy or reaction time, predicts current confidence, suggesting metacognition is uncoupled from this effect.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Machine Learning
Background:
- The human perceptual system exploits environmental regularities, leading to serial dependence where past perceptions bias current ones.
- Serial dependence extends to abstract representations like confidence judgments.
- Understanding if confidence patterns generalize across tasks and individuals is crucial for cognitive theories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the generalizability of temporal patterns in confidence judgments across observers and diverse cognitive domains.
- To determine the key factors influencing serial dependence in confidence generation.
- To explore the relationship between confidence serial dependence and metacognition.
Main Methods:
- Reanalyzed data from the Confidence Database, encompassing perceptual, memory, and cognitive paradigms.
- Employed machine learning classifiers to predict current trial confidence based on historical confidence data.
- Utilized cross-observer and cross-domain decoding to assess model generalizability.
Main Results:
- A machine learning model trained on perceptual confidence data successfully predicted confidence across different observers and cognitive domains.
- The recent history of confidence judgments was the most significant predictor of current confidence.
- Confidence predictions generalized across both correct and incorrect trials, indicating a dissociation from metacognitive evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Temporal patterns in confidence judgments exhibit domain-general and cross-observer serial dependence.
- Serial dependence in confidence is primarily driven by recent confidence history, independent of accuracy or reaction time.
- Confidence generation's serial dependence appears uncoupled from metacognition, contributing to the debate on domain-specificity versus domain-generality in cognitive processes.
More Related Videos
13:57Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
Published on: July 1, 2015
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Coefficient
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Reliability and Validity
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...