Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Meaning and Use in the Expression of Estimative Probability
Bob van Tiel1, Uli Sauerland2, Michael Franke3
1Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
This study models how people use words of estimative probability (WEPs) like 'possible'. Computational models show that both simple and complex semantic theories explain WEP usage equally well, even considering cognitive limits.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Computational Linguistics
- Psychology
Background:
- Words of estimative probability (WEPs) express uncertainty but are theorized to have crisp thresholds.
- Experimental data suggest WEP usage exhibits gradience and focality, challenging current semantic theories.
- Understanding WEPs is crucial for modeling human communication under uncertainty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To computationally model the production of WEPs.
- To compare the explanatory power of different semantic models for WEP usage.
- To investigate the relationship between autistic traits and WEP production rationality.
Main Methods:
- Development and comparison of computational models for WEP production.
- Analysis of novel WEP production data.
- Validation of models using the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) test to assess autistic traits.
Main Results:
- A threshold-based semantics model explains WEP production data as well as a model incorporating gradience and focality.
- Cognitive limitations and goal-directed speech assumptions improve model fit.
- Communicative difficulties associated with autistic traits correlate with a reduced rationality parameter in the WEP production model.
Conclusions:
- Both simple and complex semantic models can account for WEP usage patterns.
- Individual differences in communicative abilities, such as those related to autistic traits, impact pragmatic language choices.
- Computational modeling provides a framework for understanding WEP semantics and their link to cognitive and communicative factors.
More Related Videos
07:28Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
Published on: January 21, 2017
09:35A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
Published on: August 16, 2017
Related Concept Videos
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Probability in Statistics
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
Expected Value