Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.4K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.4K
Translational Regulation01:29

Translational Regulation

45
Translational regulation in prokaryotes ensures efficient protein synthesis by controlling ribosome access to mRNA. This regulation is mediated by secondary RNA structures, including translational riboswitches, RNA thermometers, and small RNAs (sRNAs), which respond to intracellular and environmental signals to modulate gene expression.Translational RiboswitchesRiboswitches in the leader region of mRNAs can regulate translation by altering the accessibility of the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence,...
45
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

1.1K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
1.1K
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

5.2K
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R...
5.2K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Cotranslational Protein Translocation01:20

Cotranslational Protein Translocation

7.4K
Translocation of proteins across membranes is an ancient process that occurs even in bacteria and archaebacteria. In fact, the components of the translocation machinery are still conserved between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Sec61 channel partners for cotranslational translocation
During cotranslational translocation, the Sec61 channel partners with the signal recognition particle (SRP), the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), and the ribosomes to transport the nascent polypeptide chain...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The need for a global effort to attend to human neural organoid and assembloid research.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Will an Enhanced Child Have Less Freedom? A U.S. Nationally Representative Survey Experiment.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same author

A Reset for Bioethics: A Statement from the Global Observatory for Genome Editing.

The CRISPR journal·2025
Same author

Religion v. Science? No and Yes.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same author

Translational Bioethical Decision-Making: Human Brain Organoids as a Case Study.

Ethics & human research·2024
Same author

Scientism, trust, value alignment, views of nature, and U.S. public opinion about gene drive mosquitos.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2024
Same journal

Policies Regarding the Inclusion of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: A Cross-Institutional Analysis.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same journal

Misaligned Expectations: Motivations of Medically Underserved People to Enroll in the All of Us Research Program.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same journal

Organ Chips and Translational Research: Identifying and Examining New Ethical Issues.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same journal

Including Research Subjects without Decision-Making Capacity Only as Last Resort.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same journal

Perspectives of Information Access in the Informed Consent Process for Clinical Research Participation in Australia.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same journal

Human Research Protections during Emergencies: An Integrative Review.

Ethics & human research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K

Translational Bioethics and Public Input.

John H Evans1

  • 1Tata Chancellor's Chair of Social Science and a codirector of the Institute for Practical Ethics at the University of California, San Diego.

Ethics & Human Research
|June 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Translational science needs a way to determine public interests. This study proposes using institutional review board (IRB) ethics to identify public values for biotechnology innovations.

Keywords:
public engagementpublic viewssocial science and bioethicstranslational bioethicstranslational science

More Related Videos

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

4.4K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.0K
Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

4.4K
A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology ethics
  • Translational science policy
  • Social science research methods

Background:

  • Translational science is vital for public good but lacks a mechanism to define public interests.
  • Traditional social science methods are insufficient for condensing public opinion on complex biotechnologies.
  • Existing approaches risk unrepresentative data or an unmanageable volume of information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel method for assessing public values in translational science.
  • To bridge the gap between scientific advancement and public interest alignment.
  • To provide a structured approach for evaluating public support for biotechnological innovations.

Main Methods:

  • Adapting the ethical framework of institutional review boards (IRBs).
  • Utilizing IRBs' simplifying and structuring ethics to generate social science reports.
  • Focusing on identifying the four to six most prominent public values or principles regarding a specific biotechnology.
  • Establishing a bioethics board to weigh and balance identified public values.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method offers a structured approach to social science data relevant to translational science.
  • It facilitates the condensation of complex public opinions into actionable insights.
  • The framework allows for a clear determination of public support for innovations.

Conclusions:

  • The IRB ethics model can be adapted to assess public values for translational science.
  • A bioethics board can effectively weigh identified public values to gauge public support.
  • This approach provides a viable mechanism for aligning biotechnology innovation with public interests.