Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2025

13:00
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
9.9K
When did it happen? Verbal information about causal relations affects time estimation.
Carmelo P Cubillas1, Helena Matute2
1Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
Consciousness and Cognition
|July 26, 2023
Summary
People perceive causally linked events as closer in time. This study shows verbal information alone can create this temporal binding effect, influencing time perception.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Perception Science
Background:
- The perception of causality is often linked to temporal proximity.
- Previous research indicates a bidirectional relationship between perceived causality and time.
- Existing studies often involve motor actions or physical feedback.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate causal binding using only verbal stimuli.
- To determine if verbal information about causality influences temporal judgments.
- To test causality- and heuristic-based explanations of temporal binding.
Main Methods:
- Six experiments were conducted.
- Participants read lists of events and verbally provided causal information.
- Participants estimated the time interval between two events.
Main Results:
- Participants informed of a causal link between events judged them as closer in time.
- This temporal binding effect occurred without motor actions or physical feedback.
- Results support causality- and heuristic-based explanations.
Conclusions:
- Verbal information about causality is sufficient to induce temporal binding.
- The findings challenge explanations relying on sensory integration or intentionality.
- This research deepens the understanding of how causality influences time perception.
Related Concept Videos
The Availability Heuristic
6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Causality in Epidemiology
482
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
482
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
369
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
369
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
341
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
341

