Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

09:46
Qualitative Identification of Carboxylic Acids, Boronic Acids, and Amines Using Cruciform Fluorophores
Published on: August 19, 2013
15.6K
Cie L*A*B* Values in VITA Classical and VITA 3D Master by Two Dental Spectrophotometers
The International Journal of Prosthodontics
|November 3, 2023
Summary
Two dental spectrophotometers showed high reliability but had discrepancies in specific shade hues, impacting color matching accuracy. These devices are useful, but variability exists for certain L*a*b* components.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Color Science in Dentistry
- Instrument Accuracy and Reliability
Background:
- Accurate dental shade matching is crucial for aesthetic restorations.
- Dental shade guides and spectrophotometers are used to achieve precise color reproduction.
- Variability between shade-matching devices can affect clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the CIE L*a*b* values of two dental shade guides using two shade-matching spectrophotometers.
- To evaluate the inter-device reliability and accuracy of SpectroShade Micro (SS) and Easyshade (ES).
Main Methods:
- SpectroShade Micro (SS) and Easyshade (ES) spectrophotometers were used to measure shade tabs from VITA Classical (VC) and VITA 3D Shade Master (VM) guides.
- 30 measurements per shade tab across three batches were performed by a calibrated operator.
- Color differences (ΔE00) and intraclass coefficients (ICC) were calculated and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant differences were found between the two devices for most L*a*b* values.
- Color differences (ΔE00) exceeded the acceptability threshold (≥1.8) for most shade tabs between devices.
- The overall mean inter-device ΔE00 was 2.2 ± 1.0 for VC and 2.5 ± 1.0 for VM.
Conclusions:
- Both dental spectrophotometers demonstrated high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values, confirming their utility as auxiliary tools.
- Discrepancies in L*a*b* values were observed between the devices, particularly for specific hues (D in VC, R in VM).
- Inter-device variability necessitates careful consideration during shade selection for predictable aesthetic results.
Related Concept Videos
UV–Vis Spectrometers
1.4K
The absorbance of UV and visible (UV–visible) radiations is measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer. Deuterium lamps, which emit UV radiation, and tungsten lamps, which produce radiation in the visible region, are used as light sources in UV–visible spectrophotometers. A monochromator or prism is used for diffraction grating, i.e., to split the incoming radiation into different wavelengths. A system of slits is used to focus the desired wavelength on the sample cell.
1.4K
Instrument Calibration
200
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
200
Ultraviolet and Visible (UV–Vis) Spectroscopy: Overview
2.7K
Ultraviolet–visible (UV–visible or UV–Vis) spectroscopy is an analytical technique that investigates the interaction between matter and UV–Vis light within the electromagnetic spectrum. This method is widely used for its versatility, simplicity, and relatively quick data acquisition, making it valuable for both qualitative and quantitative analysis. When UV–Vis radiation passes through a material, molecules absorb light depending on the energy required for...
2.7K
UV–Vis Spectroscopy of Conjugated Systems
7.1K
Organic compounds with conjugated double bonds show strong absorption features in the UV–visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum attributed to π → π* electronic excitations. Generally, a UV–vis absorption spectrum is recorded as a plot of absorbance vs wavelength. The wavelength of maximum absorbance, which manifests as a peak in the absorption spectrum, is denoted as λmax.
One of the factors influencing λmax is the extent...
One of the factors influencing λmax is the extent...
7.1K

