Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Oversight of Dual-Use Research: What Role for Ethics Committees?
Maria Magdalena Guraiib1, Anna Laura Ross2, Andreas Frewer3
1Maria M. Guraiib, MPH, is a Technical Officer, in the Research for Health Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
National ethics committees play a limited role in governing dual-use research risks, despite their potential. Strengthening multistakeholder oversight and international collaboration is recommended for responsible life sciences governance.
Area of Science:
- Life Sciences
- Bioethics
- Biosecurity Governance
Background:
- The World Health Organization's Global Guidance Framework for the Responsible Use of the Life Sciences highlights the importance of multisectoral engagement in managing biorisks.
- Dual-use research, with its significant social impact, necessitates robust ethical considerations, risk-benefit analysis, and trust.
- National ethics committees are identified as potential contributors to ethical guidance in decision-making processes for life sciences research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the specific role and contributions of national ethics committees in the governance and oversight of dual-use research at the national level.
- To analyze the current landscape of ethics committee activities concerning dual-use research oversight.
- To identify challenges and opportunities for enhancing the involvement of ethics committees in biorisk governance.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a landscape analysis of national ethics committees' activities in dual-use research oversight.
- Searched the WHO database on National Ethics Committees for relevant publications.
- Gathered additional documentation from national ethics committee websites and through author contacts.
Main Results:
- National ethics committees have contributed to policy guidance and risk assessment for dual-use research in a limited number of countries.
- The involvement of ethics committees varies significantly across different national oversight mechanisms.
- A need for coordinated, multistakeholder oversight mechanisms was identified.
Conclusions:
- National ethics committees' engagement in dual-use research governance is currently limited but holds significant potential.
- Recommendations include establishing coordinated, multistakeholder oversight and strengthening international cooperation.
- Integrating ethics committees as expert resources is crucial for effective governance of life sciences research and biorisks.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

