Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Use of Diagnostic Codes for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Polygenic Risk Score Construction in Electronic Health
Jessica H Tran1, Joyce Kang2, Elaine Han1
1From the Department of Ophthalmology (J.H.T., E.H., R.L., L.R.P.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) performed similarly whether using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes or manual record review. This suggests ICD codes may suffice for some POAG PRS applications.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are increasingly utilized to predict disease risk and prognosis.
- Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide.
- Accurate case ascertainment is crucial for developing and validating PRS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of a POAG PRS when cases are defined by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes versus manual medical record review.
- To evaluate the utility of ICD codes for POAG case identification in large biobank cohorts.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Mount Sinai BioMe and Mass General Brigham (MGB) biobanks.
- POAG cases were initially identified using ICD codes and subsequently confirmed through optical coherence tomograms and visual fields.
- A genome-wide POAG PRS was computed using the lassosum method and genotype data from the UK Biobank.
Main Results:
- The positive predictive value of ICD codes for POAG ranged from 53% to 55%, with a negative predictive value of 96% to 97%.
- Sensitivity was high (97%) for both methods, but specificity was lower for ICD codes (44%-53%) compared to manual review.
- Area Under the Curve (AUC) values for POAG prediction by PRS showed no statistically significant differences between ICD code and manual review definitions across various ancestries.
Conclusions:
- A POAG PRS demonstrates comparable predictive performance regardless of whether International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes or manual medical record review is used for case definition in electronic health record-linked biobanks.
- Manual assessment of glaucoma status may not be essential for all PRS studies, potentially streamlining research processes.
- Caution is advised when relying solely on ICD codes for glaucoma diagnosis due to their limited specificity in accurately identifying confirmed glaucoma cases.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Glaucoma: Overview
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...