Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

55
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
55
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

108
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
108
Repressed Memory01:16

Repressed Memory

62
Repressed memories are a psychological phenomenon where memories of traumatic events are unconsciously blocked from a person's awareness. This process occurs as a defense mechanism, protecting the mind from the emotional impact of distressing or painful experiences. For example, a person who has experienced childhood trauma may grow up with no conscious recollection of the event. In such cases, the memories are thought to be buried deep within the subconscious, inaccessible to the conscious...
62
False Memories01:18

False Memories

71
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
71
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

100
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
100
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

144
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
144

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a comprehensive account of verbal memory: An embedded computational model across representational domains.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Bilingualism and individual differences in short-term ordered serial recall.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

From stork to baby: Semantic relatedness can improve order memory without grouping.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Lion-Tiger-Stripes: Delimiting the Semantic Association Effect on Working Memory With Mediated Association.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Inverted list-strength effects in recognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

An embedded computational framework of memory: The critical role of representations in veridical and false recall predictions.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same journal

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Test Format Matching Moderates the Forward Testing Effect.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Affective-Motivational Task Content and Stimulus Size Modulate Cognitive Control in Task Switching.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Violent Virtual Avatar Experience on Players' Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions and Its Cognitive Neural Mechanisms.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Same Person, Different Personality?

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Competition Matters!

Experimental psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.6K

Directed Forgetting and the Production Effect.

Jackie Spear1, J Nick Reid2, Dominic Guitard3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitob, Canada.

Experimental Psychology
|December 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared directed forgetting and the production effect, finding that encoding strength, not distinctiveness, primarily drives memory performance in both cognitive tasks. These findings support a strength-based explanation for recognition memory.

Keywords:
MINERVA 2directed forgettingproduction effect

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

14.6K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

37.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.6K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

14.6K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

37.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The directed forgetting effect is attributed to differential encoding strength (remember vs. forget cues).
  • The production effect is often explained by enhanced memory distinctiveness for produced items.
  • Investigating both effects together offers insights into elaborative encoding mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the directed forgetting and production effects within a recognition memory framework.
  • To determine whether encoding strength or distinctiveness is the primary mechanism underlying these effects.
  • To bridge the gap between two established memory phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized mixed- and pure-list designs to isolate memory mechanisms.
  • Compared recognition memory performance for remember-cued vs. forget-cued targets (directed forgetting).
  • Compared recognition memory performance for produced vs. unproduced targets (production effect).

Main Results:

  • Both directed forgetting and the production effect were observed in mixed-list conditions.
  • Evidence suggests that encoding strength, rather than distinctiveness, predominantly drives results in both procedures.
  • A strength-based mechanism provided a better fit to the data than a combined strength and distinctiveness mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • Encoding strength is a key factor underlying both directed forgetting and the production effect in recognition memory.
  • The MINERVA 2 global matching model, with varying encoding strength, effectively explains the observed results.
  • A strength-based account sufficiently explains memory differences in these tasks, challenging distinctiveness-only explanations.