Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.1K
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion01:20

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

1.4K
Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
1.4K
Labeling Emotion01:20

Labeling Emotion

594
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
594
The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

178
Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be...
178
Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion01:17

Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion

2.0K
Richard Lazarus' cognitive mediational theory highlights the pivotal role of cognitive appraisal in shaping emotional responses. According to this theory, the evaluation of a stimulus — based on personal values, goals, beliefs, and expectations — mediates the emotional response. This appraisal process is immediate and often occurs unconsciously, influencing the intensity and nature of the resulting emotion.
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
2.0K
Emotional Expression01:26

Emotional Expression

921
Emotional expression encompasses how individuals convey their emotions through verbal communication and non-verbal cues. These non-verbal actions include facial expressions, body language, and physical gestures, such as frowning or smiling. Among these, facial expressions play a crucial role in emotional expression and are understood universally, indicating a biological basis for how humans communicate emotions.
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
921

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pouring, scooping, bouncing, rolling, twisting, and rotating: Does spontaneous categorical perception of dynamic event types reflect verbal encoding or visual processing?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Attending to attention: Reverse correlation reveals subtle cues to attentiveness in others' faces.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Superficial auditory (dis)fluency biases higher-level social judgment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Paranoid and teleological thinking give rise to distinct social hallucinations in vision.

Communications psychology·2024
Same author

"Visual verbs": Dynamic event types are extracted spontaneously during visual perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Spontaneous path tracing in task-irrelevant mazes: Spatial affordances trigger dynamic visual routines.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

41.1K

The El Greco Fallacy, this Time with Feeling: How (not) to Measure Group Differences in Emotional Intensity.

Vladimir Chituc1, Brian J Scholl1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, Box 208047, New Haven, CT 06520-8047 USA.

Affective Science
|November 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Group differences in anger intensity may be overestimated. Labeled scales can be misleading, but psychophysical measures like the general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS) offer more accurate insights into emotional experiences.

Keywords:
El Greco fallacyEmotionEmotional intensityGLMSSex differences

More Related Videos

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.9K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation
14:04

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation

Published on: August 26, 2011

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

41.1K
Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.9K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation
14:04

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation

Published on: August 26, 2011

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Affective science and psychological measurement.
  • Sensory psychophysics applications in emotion research.

Background:

  • Affective scientists commonly use labeled scales (e.g., Likert) to compare group differences in emotional intensity.
  • Previous research using labeled scales suggested women experience anger more intensely than men, a finding potentially affected by the 'El Greco fallacy'.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reliability of group differences in anger intensity as measured by labeled scales.
  • To determine if psychophysical measures can provide a more accurate assessment of emotional intensity differences across groups.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted, initially replicating findings with labeled scales.
  • Subsequent experiments utilized the general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS), a psychophysical measure, to assess anger intensity.
  • Comparison of results obtained from labeled scales versus the gLMS.

Main Results:

  • The apparent finding that women experience anger more intensely than men was replicated using labeled scales.
  • This group difference in anger intensity disappeared when measured using the general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS).
  • The gLMS effectively detected differences, avoiding the 'El Greco fallacy' inherent in some labeled scales.

Conclusions:

  • Labeled scales may produce artifactual group differences in emotional intensity due to measurement biases (the 'El Greco fallacy').
  • Psychophysical measures, such as the gLMS, offer a more robust method for assessing emotional intensity across different groups.
  • This study highlights the importance of employing appropriate measurement tools in psychological research to avoid misleading conclusions.